[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Tue, 05 May 2015 02:16:39 +0100
From: Ben Hutchings <ben@...adent.org.uk>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, stable@...r.kernel.org
CC: akpm@...ux-foundation.org, "Mikulas Patocka" <mpatocka@...hat.com>,
"Mike Snitzer" <snitzer@...hat.com>
Subject: [PATCH 3.2 100/221] dm: hold suspend_lock while suspending device
during device deletion
3.2.69-rc1 review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
------------------
From: Mikulas Patocka <mpatocka@...hat.com>
commit ab7c7bb6f4ab95dbca96fcfc4463cd69843e3e24 upstream.
__dm_destroy() must take the suspend_lock so that its presuspend and
postsuspend calls do not race with an internal suspend.
Signed-off-by: Mikulas Patocka <mpatocka@...hat.com>
Signed-off-by: Mike Snitzer <snitzer@...hat.com>
Signed-off-by: Ben Hutchings <ben@...adent.org.uk>
---
drivers/md/dm.c | 6 ++++++
1 file changed, 6 insertions(+)
--- a/drivers/md/dm.c
+++ b/drivers/md/dm.c
@@ -2295,10 +2295,16 @@ static void __dm_destroy(struct mapped_d
set_bit(DMF_FREEING, &md->flags);
spin_unlock(&_minor_lock);
+ /*
+ * Take suspend_lock so that presuspend and postsuspend methods
+ * do not race with internal suspend.
+ */
+ mutex_lock(&md->suspend_lock);
if (!dm_suspended_md(md)) {
dm_table_presuspend_targets(map);
dm_table_postsuspend_targets(map);
}
+ mutex_unlock(&md->suspend_lock);
/*
* Rare, but there may be I/O requests still going to complete,
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists