linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v3 03/10] mtd: nand: add NAND driver for Broadcom STB NAND controller

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Wed, 6 May 2015 14:05:34 -0700
From:	Brian Norris <computersforpeace@...il.com>
To:	Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
Cc:	linux-mtd@...ts.infradead.org, Dmitry Torokhov <dtor@...gle.com>,
	Anatol Pomazao <anatol@...gle.com>,
	Ray Jui <rjui@...adcom.com>,
	Corneliu Doban <cdoban@...adcom.com>,
	Jonathan Richardson <jonathar@...adcom.com>,
	Scott Branden <sbranden@...adcom.com>,
	Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>,
	Rafał Miłecki <zajec5@...il.com>,
	bcm-kernel-feedback-list@...adcom.com,
	Dan Ehrenberg <dehrenberg@...omium.org>,
	Gregory Fong <gregory.0xf0@...il.com>,
	devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Kevin Cernekee <cernekee@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 03/10] mtd: nand: add NAND driver for Broadcom STB
 NAND controller

On Wed, May 06, 2015 at 09:17:36PM +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> On Wednesday 06 May 2015 10:59:47 Brian Norris wrote:
> > +
> > +static inline u32 nand_readreg(struct brcmnand_controller *ctrl, u32 offs)
> > +{
> > +       return __raw_readl(ctrl->nand_base + offs);
> > +}
> > +
> > +static inline void nand_writereg(struct brcmnand_controller *ctrl, u32 offs,
> > +                                u32 val)
> > +{
> > +       __raw_writel(val, ctrl->nand_base + offs);
> > +}
> > +
> > 
> 
> You had mentioned previously that there might be an endianess issue in this
> driver.

Might. I have a patch already, but I failed to boot a BE kernel, so I
kept it out for now. If you don't mind, I'd prefer patching something
like this once it's testable on ARM BE. This *is*, however, extensively
tested on MIPS (LE and BE) and ARM (LE).

> I think this won't work on big-endian architectures other than MIPS,
> so it would be good to either list in the DT the endianess of the device
> and use appropriate accessors here, or hardcode it based on the architecture
> (using ioread32_be in big-endian mips, but readl elsewhere).

I suspect we wouldn't need a DT property but could just special-case
MIPS BE, as you note.

> Using __raw_writel has another problem regarding the DMA capability of this
> driver, as it will not flush any write buffers or synchronize caches before
> sending data off to the device, so you risk data corruption.

We use mb() before kicking off DMA or other commands.

> Also, the
> compiler can choose to split up the 32-bit word access into byte accesses,
> which on most hardware does not do what you want.

Huh? Wouldn't that break just about every driver in existence? And how
is writel() any different than __raw_writel() in that regard? From
include/asm-generic/io.h:

static inline void writel(u32 value, volatile void __iomem *addr)
{
        __raw_writel(__cpu_to_le32(value), addr);
}

And BTW, splitting isn't possible on ARM. From
arch/arm/include/asm/io.h:

static inline void __raw_writel(u32 val, volatile void __iomem *addr)
{
        asm volatile("str %1, %0"
                     : "+Qo" (*(volatile u32 __force *)addr)
                     : "r" (val));
}

Brian
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/