linux-kernel - Re: [Question] How does perf still record the stack of a specified pid even when that process is interrupted and CPU is scheduled to other process

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <554994F0.7010406@huawei.com>
Date:	Wed, 6 May 2015 12:13:36 +0800
From:	Yunlong Song <yunlong.song@...wei.com>
To:	Rabin Vincent <rabin@....in>, David Ahern <dsahern@...il.com>
CC:	<a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>, <paulus@...ba.org>, <mingo@...hat.com>,
	"Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo" <acme@...nel.org>,
	<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <wangnan0@...wei.com>
Subject: Re: [Question] How does perf still record the stack of a specified
 pid even when that process is interrupted and CPU is scheduled to other process

On 2015/5/6 5:53, Rabin Vincent wrote:
> On Sat, Apr 25, 2015 at 09:53:57AM -0600, David Ahern wrote:
>> On 4/25/15 8:05 AM, Yunlong Song wrote:
>>> But this only shows the system call like strace, but we want the call
>>> stack of kernel functions in fact.
>>>
>> We haven't added the callchain option yet; on the to-do list.
>>
>> perf trace record -g -- iozone ...
>> perf trace -i perf.data -s
>> --> summary of system calls, max/min/average times
>>
>> perf trace -i perf.data --duration 10.0 -T
>> --> note the timestamp where the write took a "long" time
>>
>> perf script
>> --> search down to *around* the time of interest; you want the syscall
>> entry; timestamp is for exit
> 
> Now if I understood the use case right, what Yulong Song wants to know
> is what the iozone process is doing in the kernel (i.e. the stacktrace of why
> exactly it goes to sleep / what it's waiting for) during these
> sys_writes which take a long time.  
> 
> The commands above will identify the sys_write which takes time but only
> provide the stacktrace at the entry and exit of the syscall, but this do
> not show why the process blocked or what it did inside the system call.
> 
> So a way to get what is required for the use case would be to make the
> following changes to the above sequence:
> 
> (1) include the sched:* events when perf trace record is run
> 
> (2) around the time of interest, look at the kernel stack st the sched:switch 
>     events between the entry and the exit.  This will show what the process was
>     waiting for when it when it blocked.  The stacktraces at the
>     stat_runtime events in the process may also be useful to understand what
>     was going on.
> 
> Example:
> 
> $ perf trace record -g -e sched:* -- dd if=/dev/zero of=/x bs=10M count=100 conv=fsync
> $ perf trace -i perf.data -s
> 
>  dd (147), 364 events, 94.3%, 0.000 msec
> 
>    syscall            calls      min       avg       max      stddev
>    --------------- -------- --------- --------- ---------     ------
>    write                 63   266.019   316.896   963.413      4.69%
>    ...
> 
> $ perf trace -i perf.data --duration 960 -T
>  91916.354 (963.413 ms): dd/147 write(arg0: 1, arg1: 139729327423488, arg2: 10485760, arg3: 582, arg4: 100, arg5: 72340172838076673) = 10485760
> 
> $ perf script
> ...
> 
> dd   147 [002]    90.952941: raw_syscalls:sys_enter: NR 1 (1, 7f1544ed0000, a00000, 246, 64, 101010101010101)
> 	          211a00 syscall_trace_enter_phase2 ([kernel.kallsyms])
> 	          7d79c3 tracesys_phase2 ([kernel.kallsyms])
> 	            ed20 [unknown] (/lib/libpthread-2.16.so)
> 
> (... trimmed everything except the longest block: ...)
> 
> dd   147 [002]    91.204723: sched:sched_switch: prev_comm=dd prev_pid=147 prev_prio=120 prev_state=D ==> next_comm=swapper/2 next_pid=0 next_prio=120
> 	          7d1121 __schedule ([kernel.kallsyms])
> 	          7d1817 schedule ([kernel.kallsyms])
> 	          4578a5 jbd2_log_wait_commit ([kernel.kallsyms])
> 	          4546ff jbd2_log_do_checkpoint ([kernel.kallsyms])
> 	          45489f __jbd2_log_wait_for_space ([kernel.kallsyms])
> 	          44c2d8 start_this_handle ([kernel.kallsyms])
> 	          44c7b6 jbd2__journal_start ([kernel.kallsyms])
> 	          42fc3b __ext4_journal_start_sb ([kernel.kallsyms])
> 	          4012e9 ext4_write_begin ([kernel.kallsyms])
> 	          33795f generic_perform_write ([kernel.kallsyms])
> 	          338b68 __generic_file_write_iter ([kernel.kallsyms])
> 	          3f4371 ext4_file_write_iter ([kernel.kallsyms])
> 	          381ae1 __vfs_write ([kernel.kallsyms])
> 	          381f07 vfs_write ([kernel.kallsyms])
> 	          3825dd sys_write ([kernel.kallsyms])
> 	          7d7a1a tracesys_phase2 ([kernel.kallsyms])
> 	            ed20 [unknown] (/lib/libpthread-2.16.so)
> 
> swapper     0 [002]    91.875573: sched:sched_wakeup: comm=dd pid=147 prio=120 success=1 target_cpu=002
> 
> .
> 

Good, it's clearer with "sched:*" event.

-- 
Thanks,
Yunlong Song

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/