lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Wed, 06 May 2015 13:05:37 +0800 From: Chao Yu <chao2.yu@...sung.com> To: 'Jaegeuk Kim' <jaegeuk@...nel.org> Cc: 'Changman Lee' <cm224.lee@...sung.com>, linux-f2fs-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org Subject: RE: [PATCH v2 1/3] f2fs: introduce replace_block() for reuse Hi Jaegeuk, Sorry for the delay. > -----Original Message----- > From: Jaegeuk Kim [mailto:jaegeuk@...nel.org] > Sent: Friday, May 01, 2015 2:04 AM > To: Chao Yu > Cc: Changman Lee; linux-f2fs-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net; linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org > Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/3] f2fs: introduce replace_block() for reuse > > Hi Chao, > > On Thu, Apr 30, 2015 at 06:11:35PM +0800, Chao Yu wrote: > > Introduce a generic function replace_block base on recover_data_page, > > and export it. So wit it we can operate file's meta data which is in > > CP/SSA area when we invoke fallocate with FALLOC_FL_COLLAPSE_RANGE flag. > > > > Signed-off-by: Chao Yu <chao2.yu@...sung.com> > > --- > > fs/f2fs/f2fs.h | 4 ++-- > > fs/f2fs/recovery.c | 2 +- > > fs/f2fs/segment.c | 33 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++------- > > 3 files changed, 29 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-) > > > > diff --git a/fs/f2fs/f2fs.h b/fs/f2fs/f2fs.h > > index 8be6cab..7ab06e8 100644 > > --- a/fs/f2fs/f2fs.h > > +++ b/fs/f2fs/f2fs.h > > @@ -1560,8 +1560,8 @@ void write_node_page(struct f2fs_sb_info *, struct page *, > > void write_data_page(struct page *, struct dnode_of_data *, > > struct f2fs_io_info *); > > void rewrite_data_page(struct page *, struct f2fs_io_info *); > > -void recover_data_page(struct f2fs_sb_info *, struct page *, > > - struct f2fs_summary *, block_t, block_t); > > +void replace_block(struct f2fs_sb_info *, struct f2fs_summary *, > > + block_t, block_t, bool); > > void allocate_data_block(struct f2fs_sb_info *, struct page *, > > block_t, block_t *, struct f2fs_summary *, int); > > void f2fs_wait_on_page_writeback(struct page *, enum page_type); > > diff --git a/fs/f2fs/recovery.c b/fs/f2fs/recovery.c > > index b80d9d4..703ab2f 100644 > > --- a/fs/f2fs/recovery.c > > +++ b/fs/f2fs/recovery.c > > @@ -412,7 +412,7 @@ static int do_recover_data(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi, struct inode *inode, > > set_summary(&sum, dn.nid, dn.ofs_in_node, ni.version); > > > > /* write dummy data page */ > > - recover_data_page(sbi, NULL, &sum, src, dest); > > + replace_block(sbi, &sum, src, dest, true); > > It's a little bit confusing. > The recover_data_page wants not to recover curseg, right? > > So, does it need to call replace_block(.., false); You're right, my mistake. The following code in this patch should be wrong, let me fix it as you suggested. Thank you for the review! Regards, > > > dn.data_blkaddr = dest; > > set_data_blkaddr(&dn); > > f2fs_update_extent_cache(&dn); > > diff --git a/fs/f2fs/segment.c b/fs/f2fs/segment.c > > index f939660..3db92fe 100644 > > --- a/fs/f2fs/segment.c > > +++ b/fs/f2fs/segment.c > > @@ -1258,26 +1258,34 @@ void rewrite_data_page(struct page *page, struct f2fs_io_info *fio) > > f2fs_submit_page_mbio(F2FS_P_SB(page), page, fio); > > } > > > > -void recover_data_page(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi, > > - struct page *page, struct f2fs_summary *sum, > > - block_t old_blkaddr, block_t new_blkaddr) > > +void replace_block(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi, struct f2fs_summary *sum, > > How about f2fs_replace_block()? > > > + block_t old_blkaddr, block_t new_blkaddr, > > + bool recover_curseg) > > { > > struct sit_info *sit_i = SIT_I(sbi); > > struct curseg_info *curseg; > > unsigned int segno, old_cursegno; > > struct seg_entry *se; > > int type; > > + unsigned short old_blkoff; > > > > segno = GET_SEGNO(sbi, new_blkaddr); > > se = get_seg_entry(sbi, segno); > > type = se->type; > > > > - if (se->valid_blocks == 0 && !IS_CURSEG(sbi, segno)) { > > - if (old_blkaddr == NULL_ADDR) > > - type = CURSEG_COLD_DATA; > > - else > > + if (recover_curseg) { > > if (!recover_curseg) { ? > > > + /* for recovery flow */ > > + if (se->valid_blocks == 0 && !IS_CURSEG(sbi, segno)) { > > + if (old_blkaddr == NULL_ADDR) > > + type = CURSEG_COLD_DATA; > > + else > > + type = CURSEG_WARM_DATA; > > + } > > + } else { > > + if (!IS_CURSEG(sbi, segno)) > > type = CURSEG_WARM_DATA; > > } > > + > > curseg = CURSEG_I(sbi, type); > > > > mutex_lock(&curseg->curseg_mutex); > > @@ -1289,6 +1297,10 @@ void recover_data_page(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi, > > if (segno != curseg->segno) { > > curseg->next_segno = segno; > > change_curseg(sbi, type, true); > > + recover_curseg = true; > > ^---- Why ? > > > + } else { > > } else if {recover_curseg) { > > > + old_blkoff = curseg->next_blkoff; > > + recover_curseg = false; > > ^---- Ditto > > > } > > > > curseg->next_blkoff = GET_BLKOFF_FROM_SEG0(sbi, new_blkaddr); > > @@ -1297,6 +1309,13 @@ void recover_data_page(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi, > > refresh_sit_entry(sbi, old_blkaddr, new_blkaddr); > > locate_dirty_segment(sbi, old_cursegno); > > > > + if (recover_curseg) { > > + cureg->next_segno = old_cursegno; > > + change_curseg(sbi, type, true); > > + } else { > > + curseg->next_blkoff = old_blkoff; > > + } > > Do we have to do like this? > > if (recover_curseg) { > cureg->next_segno = old_cursegno; > change_curseg(sbi, type, true); > curseg->next_blkoff = old_blkoff; > } > > Thanks, > > > + > > mutex_unlock(&sit_i->sentry_lock); > > mutex_unlock(&curseg->curseg_mutex); > > } > > -- > > 2.3.3 -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists