linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH RFC] Coccinelle: Check for return not matching function signature

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <5549BFAC.2010609@users.sourceforge.net>
Date:	Wed, 06 May 2015 09:15:56 +0200
From:	SF Markus Elfring <elfring@...rs.sourceforge.net>
To:	Nicholas Mc Guire <hofrat@...dl.org>
CC:	Nicholas Mc Guire <der.herr@...r.at>, cocci@...teme.lip6.fr,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC] Coccinelle: Check for return not matching function
 signature

> +virtual context
> +virtual org
> +virtual report

Where do you want to reuse these variables in your SmPL scripts?


> +@...ch@
> +identifier f,ret;
> +position p;
> +type T1,T2;
> +@@
> +
> +T1 f(...) {
> + T2 ret;

Will it be more helpful to mark only such variable declarations
where the specified data type should be reconsidered
by a minus character or an asterisk (instead of the following
return statement)?

> +<+...
> +* return@p ret
> +;
> +...+>
> +}


Regards,
Markus

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/