[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAJKOXPfu-O8XnbYjjn4hz0EGpN1R2afeS1Fjvhb4XDjQof0iXA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 6 May 2015 16:58:27 +0900
From: Krzysztof Kozłowski <k.kozlowski.k@...il.com>
To: Anda-Maria Nicolae <anda-maria.nicolae@...el.com>
Cc: sre@...nel.org, dbaryshkov@...il.com, robh+dt@...nel.org,
pawel.moll@....com, mark.rutland@....com,
ijc+devicetree@...lion.org.uk, galak@...eaurora.org,
dwmw2@...radead.org, linux-pm@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] power_supply: Add support for Richtek rt9455 battery charger
2015-05-06 1:32 GMT+09:00 Anda-Maria Nicolae <anda-maria.nicolae@...el.com>:
> Based on the datasheet found here:
> http://www.richtek.com/download_ds.jsp?p=RT9455
>
> Signed-off-by: Anda-Maria Nicolae <anda-maria.nicolae@...el.com>
> ---
>
> Updates from v2 version:
> - removed unused masks and keep the used ones. I have tried to access mask field
> from struct regmap_field, but I have received the following compilation error:
> "dereferencing pointer to incomplete type". I think this happens because I include
> the file include/linux/regmap.h and in this file struct regmap_field is only declared
> and not defined. Struct regmap_field is defined in drivers/base/regmap/internal.h.
> If I include this file, compilation works. But I do not think it is a good idea
> to include it; I did not find any other driver which includes this file. I also
> could not find any driver that accesses mask field from struct regmap_field.
> For instance, drivers/pwm/pwm-sti.c at lines 157, 158, also uses masks.
>
> - I have also kept REG_FIELD definitions for interrupt registers, since, for instance,
> I use F_BATAB to check battery presence property.
>
> - cached regs 0x05 and 0x06. Also, I have added rt9455_is_writeable_reg function
> for writeable_reg field of regmap_config.
>
> - used POWER_STATUS_DISCHARGING, replaced break with and replaced it with return and
> indented it correctly. I spent some time on this and I finally understood what is happening.
> So, if PWR_RDY bit is set, but STAT bits value is 0, the charger may be in one
> of the following cases:
> 1. CHG_EN bit is 0.
> 2. CHG_EN bit is 1 but the battery is not connected.
> In any of these cases, POWER_SUPPLY_STATUS_NOT_CHARGING is returned.
> If the PWR_RDY bit is cleared, POWER_SUPPLY_STATUS_DISCHARGING is returned.
>
> - used VOREG bits value instead of VMREG in functions rt9455_charger_get_voltage_max()/
> rt9455_charger_set_voltage_max(). Although RT9455 charger has VMREG bits which,
> according to the datasheet, represent "Maximum battery regulation voltage", the
> charger never uses VMREG value as maximum threshold for battery voltage. This
> happens because TE and TE_SHDN_EN bits are set during rt9455_probe(), and charging
> operation is terminated when charging current is less than ICHRG x IEOC. When charging
> operation is terminated, battery voltage is almost equal to VOREG. Therefore,
> VMREG value is not taken into account. This is the reason why VOREG value is
> set/returned in these functions.
>
> - corrected comment from rt9455_usb_event_id() function.
>
> - replaced IS_ERR_OR_NULL() with IS_ERR() to check the result of usb_get_phy()
> function. Also, if usb_register_notifier() fails, since usb_put_phy() is immediately
> called, I have set info->usb_phy to ERR_PTR(-ENODEV) so that in rt9455_remove()
> usb_put_phy is not mistakenly called again.
>
> .../devicetree/bindings/power/rt9455_charger.txt | 43 +
> .../devicetree/bindings/vendor-prefixes.txt | 1 +
> drivers/power/Kconfig | 6 +
> drivers/power/Makefile | 1 +
> drivers/power/rt9455_charger.c | 1801 ++++++++++++++++++++
> 5 files changed, 1852 insertions(+)
> create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/power/rt9455_charger.txt
> create mode 100644 drivers/power/rt9455_charger.c
>
> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/power/rt9455_charger.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/power/rt9455_charger.txt
> new file mode 100644
> index 0000000..7e8aed6
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/power/rt9455_charger.txt
> @@ -0,0 +1,43 @@
> +Binding for Richtek rt9455 battery charger
> +
> +Required properties:
> +- compatible: Should contain one of the following:
> + * "richtek,rt9455"
> +
> +- reg: integer, i2c address of the device.
> +- richtek,output-charge-current: integer, output current from the charger to the
> + battery, in uA.
> +- richtek,end-of-charge-percentage: integer, percent of the output charge current.
> + When the current in constant-voltage phase drops
> + below output_charge_current x end-of-charge-percentage,
> + charge is terminated.
> +- richtek,battery-regulation-voltage: integer, maximum battery voltage in uV.
> +
> +Optional properties:
> +- richtek,min-input-voltage-regulation: integer, input voltage level in uA, used to
> + decrease voltage level when the over current
> + of the input power source occurs.
> + This prevents input voltage drop due to insufficient
> + current provided by the power source.
> +- richtek,avg-input-current-regulation: integer, input current value drained by the
> + charger from the power source.
> +
> +Example:
> +
> +rt9455@22 {
> + compatible = "richtek,rt9455";
> + reg = <0x22>;
> +
> + interrupt-parent = <&gpio1>;
> + interrupts = <0 1>;
> +
> + interrupt-gpio = <&gpio1 0 1>;
> + reset-gpio = <&gpio1 1 1>;
> +
> + richtek,output-charge-current = <500000>;
> + richtek,end-of-charge-percentage = <10>;
> + richtek,battery-regulation-voltage = <4200000>;
> +
> + richtek,min-input-voltage-regulation = <4500000>;
> + richtek,avg-input-current-regulation = <500000>;
> +};
> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/vendor-prefixes.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/vendor-prefixes.txt
> index 8033919..7b8c129 100644
> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/vendor-prefixes.txt
> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/vendor-prefixes.txt
> @@ -161,6 +161,7 @@ ralink Mediatek/Ralink Technology Corp.
> ramtron Ramtron International
> realtek Realtek Semiconductor Corp.
> renesas Renesas Electronics Corporation
> +richtek Richtek Technology Corporation
> ricoh Ricoh Co. Ltd.
> rockchip Fuzhou Rockchip Electronics Co., Ltd
> samsung Samsung Semiconductor
> diff --git a/drivers/power/Kconfig b/drivers/power/Kconfig
> index 4091fb0..39f208d 100644
> --- a/drivers/power/Kconfig
> +++ b/drivers/power/Kconfig
> @@ -439,6 +439,12 @@ config BATTERY_RT5033
> The fuelgauge calculates and determines the battery state of charge
> according to battery open circuit voltage.
>
> +config CHARGER_RT9455
> + tristate "Richtek RT9455 battery charger driver"
> + depends on I2C && GPIOLIB
Laurentiu Palcu pointed already the need of REGMAP_I2C dependency.
Actually you need to select it.
(...)
> +
> +static int rt9455_charger_property_is_writeable(struct power_supply *psy,
> + enum power_supply_property psp)
> +{
> + switch (psp) {
> + case POWER_SUPPLY_PROP_CONSTANT_CHARGE_CURRENT:
> + case POWER_SUPPLY_PROP_CONSTANT_CHARGE_VOLTAGE:
> + case POWER_SUPPLY_PROP_CONSTANT_CHARGE_VOLTAGE_MAX:
> + return 1;
> + default:
> + return 0;
> + }
> +}
And comments from previous email? Which "numerous charger drivers" expose these
properties as writable?
(...)
> +static int rt9455_probe(struct i2c_client *client,
> + const struct i2c_device_id *id)
> +{
> + struct i2c_adapter *adapter = to_i2c_adapter(client->dev.parent);
> + struct device *dev = &client->dev;
> + struct rt9455_info *info;
> + struct power_supply_config rt9455_charger_config = {};
> + /* mandatory device-specific data values */
> + u32 ichrg, ieoc_percentage, voreg;
> + /* optional device-specific data values */
> + u32 mivr = -1, iaicr = -1;
> + int i, ret;
> +
> + if (!i2c_check_functionality(adapter, I2C_FUNC_SMBUS_BYTE_DATA)) {
> + dev_err(dev, "No support for SMBUS_BYTE_DATA\n");
> + return -ENODEV;
> + }
> + info = devm_kzalloc(dev, sizeof(*info), GFP_KERNEL);
> + if (!info)
> + return -ENOMEM;
> +
> + info->client = client;
> + i2c_set_clientdata(client, info);
> +
> + info->regmap = devm_regmap_init_i2c(client,
> + &rt9455_regmap_config);
> + if (IS_ERR(info->regmap)) {
> + dev_err(dev, "Failed to initialize register map\n");
> + return -EINVAL;
> + }
> +
> + for (i = 0; i < F_MAX_FIELDS; i++) {
> + info->regmap_fields[i] =
> + devm_regmap_field_alloc(dev, info->regmap,
> + rt9455_reg_fields[i]);
> + if (IS_ERR(info->regmap_fields[i])) {
> + dev_err(dev,
> + "Failed to allocate regmap field = %d\n", i);
> + return PTR_ERR(info->regmap_fields[i]);
> + }
> + }
> +
> + ret = rt9455_discover_charger(info, &ichrg, &ieoc_percentage,
> + &voreg, &mivr, &iaicr);
> + if (ret) {
> + dev_err(dev, "Failed to discover charger\n");
> + return ret;
> + }
> +
> +#if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_USB_PHY)
> + info->usb_phy = usb_get_phy(USB_PHY_TYPE_USB2);
> + if (IS_ERR(info->usb_phy)) {
> + dev_err(dev, "Failed to get USB transceiver\n");
> + } else {
> + info->nb.notifier_call = rt9455_usb_event;
> + ret = usb_register_notifier(info->usb_phy, &info->nb);
> + if (ret) {
> + dev_err(dev, "Failed to register USB notifier\n");
> + usb_put_phy(info->usb_phy);
> + /*
> + * Since usb_put_phy() has been called, info->usb_phy is
> + * set to ERR_PTR so that in rt9455_remove()
> + * usb_put_phy() is not mistakenly called again.
> + */
> + info->usb_phy = ERR_PTR(-ENODEV);
> + }
> + }
> +#endif
> +
> + INIT_DEFERRABLE_WORK(&info->pwr_rdy_work, rt9455_pwr_rdy_work_callback);
> + INIT_DEFERRABLE_WORK(&info->max_charging_time_work,
> + rt9455_max_charging_time_work_callback);
> + INIT_DEFERRABLE_WORK(&info->batt_presence_work,
> + rt9455_batt_presence_work_callback);
> +
> + rt9455_charger_config.of_node = dev->of_node;
> + rt9455_charger_config.drv_data = info;
> + rt9455_charger_config.supplied_to = rt9455_charger_supplied_to;
> + rt9455_charger_config.num_supplicants =
> + ARRAY_SIZE(rt9455_charger_supplied_to);
> + ret = devm_request_threaded_irq(dev, client->irq, NULL,
> + rt9455_irq_handler_thread,
> + IRQF_TRIGGER_LOW | IRQF_ONESHOT,
> + RT9455_DRIVER_NAME, info);
> + if (ret) {
> + dev_err(dev, "Failed to register IRQ handler\n");
I pointed this 2 times, so maybe third time lucky? I think we
misunderstood each other. Why are you not cleaning the usb_phy? If
this fails then you should goto put_usb_phy because now it leaks.
> + return ret;
> + }
> +
> + ret = rt9455_hw_init(info, ichrg, ieoc_percentage, voreg, mivr, iaicr);
> + if (ret) {
> + dev_err(dev, "Failed to set charger to its default values\n");
> + return ret;
Ditto.
Best regards,
Krzysztof
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists