[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20150506081143.GV23123@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net>
Date: Wed, 6 May 2015 10:11:43 +0200
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To: Vikas Shivappa <vikas.shivappa@...el.com>
Cc: Vikas Shivappa <vikas.shivappa@...ux.intel.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, x86@...nel.org, hpa@...or.com,
tglx@...utronix.de, mingo@...nel.org, tj@...nel.org,
Matt Fleming <matt.fleming@...el.com>,
"Auld, Will" <will.auld@...el.com>, peter.zijlstra@...el.com,
h.peter.anvin@...el.com,
"Juvva, Kanaka D" <kanaka.d.juvva@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/7] x86/intel_rdt: Support cache bit mask for Intel CAT
On Mon, May 04, 2015 at 10:30:15AM -0700, Vikas Shivappa wrote:
> Will fix the whitespace issues (including before return) or other possible
> coding convention issues.
>
> It could be more of a common sense to have this in checkpatch rather that
> manually having to pointing out. If you want to have fun with that go for it
> though.
My main objection was that your coding style is entirely inconsistent
with itself.
Sometimes you have a whitespace before return, sometimes you do not.
Sometimes you have exit labels with locks, sometimes you do not.
etc..
Pick one stick to it; although we'd all much prefer if you pick the one
that's common to the kernel.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists