linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 3.2 068/221] firmware: dmi_scan: Fix dmi

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <5549D43B.70804@globallogic.com>
Date:	Wed, 06 May 2015 11:43:39 +0300
From:	"ivan.khoronzhuk" <ivan.khoronzhuk@...ballogic.com>
To:	Ben Hutchings <ben@...adent.org.uk>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	stable@...r.kernel.org
CC:	akpm@...ux-foundation.org, Ard Biesheuvel <ard@...aro.org>,
	Matt Fleming <matt.fleming@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3.2 068/221] firmware: dmi_scan: Fix dmi_len type

Hi Ben,

There is no need in this patch for 3.2, only beginning from 3.19.
SMBIOSv3 is absent in k3.2, and for previous SMBIOS versions 16-bit dmi len
is enough. It should had been mentioned in the commit/code, sorry.

On 05.05.15 04:16, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> 3.2.69-rc1 review patch.  If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
>
> ------------------
>
> From: Ivan Khoronzhuk <ivan.khoronzhuk@...aro.org>
>
> commit 6d9ff473317245e3e5cd9922b4520411c2296388 upstream.
>
> According to SMBIOSv3 specification the length of DMI table can be
> up to 32bits wide. So use appropriate type to avoid overflow.
>
> It's obvious that dmi_num theoretically can be more than u16 also,
> so it's can be changed to u32 or at least it's better to use int
> instead of u16, but on that moment I cannot imagine dmi structure
> count more than 65535 and it can require changing type of vars that
> work with it. So I didn't correct it.
>
> Acked-by: Ard Biesheuvel <ard@...aro.org>
> Signed-off-by: Ivan Khoronzhuk <ivan.khoronzhuk@...aro.org>
> Signed-off-by: Matt Fleming <matt.fleming@...el.com>
> [bwh: Backported to 3.2: adjust context]
> Signed-off-by: Ben Hutchings <ben@...adent.org.uk>
> ---
>   drivers/firmware/dmi_scan.c | 4 ++--
>   1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> --- a/drivers/firmware/dmi_scan.c
> +++ b/drivers/firmware/dmi_scan.c
> @@ -69,7 +69,7 @@ static char * __init dmi_string(const st
>    *	We have to be cautious here. We have seen BIOSes with DMI pointers
>    *	pointing to completely the wrong place for example
>    */
> -static void dmi_table(u8 *buf, int len, int num,
> +static void dmi_table(u8 *buf, u32 len, int num,
>   		      void (*decode)(const struct dmi_header *, void *),
>   		      void *private_data)
>   {
> @@ -99,7 +99,7 @@ static void dmi_table(u8 *buf, int len,
>   }
>   
>   static u32 dmi_base;
> -static u16 dmi_len;
> +static u32 dmi_len;
>   static u16 dmi_num;
>   
>   static int __init dmi_walk_early(void (*decode)(const struct dmi_header *,
>
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

-- 
Regards,
Ivan Khoronzhuk

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/