linux-kernel - [PATCH 7/9] misc: sram: simplify probe error path

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <1430912408-1239-9-git-send-email-vladimir_zapolskiy@mentor.com>
Date:	Wed, 6 May 2015 14:40:06 +0300
From:	Vladimir Zapolskiy <vladimir_zapolskiy@...tor.com>
To:	Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
	Heiko Stübner <heiko@...ech.de>,
	Philipp Zabel <p.zabel@...gutronix.de>
CC:	<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: [PATCH 7/9] misc: sram: simplify probe error path

Reserved block logic relies only on information from device tree,
there is no need to get and enable device clock in advance, especially
because unprovided clock is not considered as an error. No
functional change, but minus one label.

Signed-off-by: Vladimir Zapolskiy <vladimir_zapolskiy@...tor.com>
---
 drivers/misc/sram.c |   20 ++++++++------------
 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/misc/sram.c b/drivers/misc/sram.c
index 1ad979f..935b3fa 100644
--- a/drivers/misc/sram.c
+++ b/drivers/misc/sram.c
@@ -100,22 +100,14 @@ static int sram_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
 	if (!sram->pool)
 		return -ENOMEM;
 
-	sram->clk = devm_clk_get(sram->dev, NULL);
-	if (IS_ERR(sram->clk))
-		sram->clk = NULL;
-	else
-		clk_prepare_enable(sram->clk);
-
 	/*
 	 * We need an additional block to mark the end of the memory region
 	 * after the reserved blocks from the dt are processed.
 	 */
 	nblocks = (np) ? of_get_available_child_count(np) + 1 : 1;
 	rblocks = kmalloc((nblocks) * sizeof(*rblocks), GFP_KERNEL);
-	if (!rblocks) {
+	if (!rblocks)
 		ret = -ENOMEM;
-		goto err_alloc;
-	}
 
 	block = &rblocks[0];
 	for_each_available_child_of_node(np, child) {
@@ -198,6 +190,12 @@ static int sram_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
 
 	kfree(rblocks);
 
+	sram->clk = devm_clk_get(sram->dev, NULL);
+	if (IS_ERR(sram->clk))
+		sram->clk = NULL;
+	else
+		clk_prepare_enable(sram->clk);
+
 	platform_set_drvdata(pdev, sram);
 
 	dev_dbg(&pdev->dev, "SRAM pool: %zu KiB @ 0x%p\n",
@@ -207,9 +205,7 @@ static int sram_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
 
 err_chunks:
 	kfree(rblocks);
-err_alloc:
-	if (sram->clk)
-		clk_disable_unprepare(sram->clk);
+
 	return ret;
 }
 
-- 
1.7.10.4

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/