[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <554A08CF.4000509@acm.org>
Date: Wed, 06 May 2015 07:27:59 -0500
From: Corey Minyard <minyard@....org>
To: Hidehiro Kawai <hidehiro.kawai.ez@...achi.com>
CC: openipmi-developer@...ts.sourceforge.net,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ipmi: Fix a problem that messages are not issued in run_to_completion
mode
On 04/28/2015 07:41 AM, Hidehiro Kawai wrote:
> Hello,
>
> (2015/04/24 22:00), Corey Minyard wrote:
>> Ah, yes, you are correct. Queued for 4.1. Thanks.
> Thank you for the review.
>
> By the way, I'm planning some enhancements of IPMI driver
> in panic context. Currently, we can call panic notifiers
> before crash_kexec() by specifying crash_kexec_post_notifiers
> as a boot parameter. By utilizing this feature, we can write
> SEL records before entering kdump process; we can save some
> information even if kdump fails. Here, notifier calls
> shouldn't prevent the kdump process. So, the reliability of
> panic notifier calls is very important.
I thought these were called before crash_kexec(). But if not that would
be a good enhancement.
> I noticed that there are possible infinite loops in the
> panic notifier call of IPMI driver (we assume BMC is
> unreliable). To evict possible infinite loops, I'm considering
> introducing some retry timeout or retry count limit to the
> run_to_completion procedure.
>
> Do you have any opinions?
That's probably a good idea. My thought was to keep trying in hopes of
getting something out, but you are probably right, a timeout after a few
minutes is probably appropriate.
-corey
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists