lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20150506134127.GE22949@pd.tnic>
Date:	Wed, 6 May 2015 15:41:27 +0200
From:	Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>
To:	Toshi Kani <toshi.kani@...com>
Cc:	akpm@...ux-foundation.org, hpa@...or.com, tglx@...utronix.de,
	mingo@...hat.com, linux-mm@...ck.org, x86@...nel.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, dave.hansen@...el.com,
	Elliott@...com, pebolle@...cali.nl
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 6/7] mtrr, x86: Clean up mtrr_type_lookup()

On Tue, Mar 24, 2015 at 04:08:40PM -0600, Toshi Kani wrote:
> MTRRs contain fixed and variable entries.  mtrr_type_lookup()
> may repeatedly call __mtrr_type_lookup() to handle a request
> that overlaps with variable entries.  However,
> __mtrr_type_lookup() also handles the fixed entries, which
> do not have to be repeated.  Therefore, this patch creates
> separate functions, mtrr_type_lookup_fixed() and
> mtrr_type_lookup_variable(), to handle the fixed and variable
> ranges respectively.
> 
> The patch also updates the function headers to clarify the
> return values and output argument.  It updates comments to
> clarify that the repeating is necessary to handle overlaps
> with the default type, since overlaps with multiple entries
> alone can be handled without such repeating.
> 
> There is no functional change in this patch.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Toshi Kani <toshi.kani@...com>
> ---
>  arch/x86/kernel/cpu/mtrr/generic.c |  137 +++++++++++++++++++++++-------------
>  1 file changed, 86 insertions(+), 51 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/mtrr/generic.c b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/mtrr/generic.c
> index 8bd1298..3652e2b 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/mtrr/generic.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/mtrr/generic.c
> @@ -102,55 +102,69 @@ static int check_type_overlap(u8 *prev, u8 *curr)
>  	return 0;
>  }
>  
> -/*
> - * Error/Semi-error returns:
> - * MTRR_TYPE_INVALID - when MTRR is not enabled
> - * *repeat == 1 implies [start:end] spanned across MTRR range and type returned
> - *		corresponds only to [start:*partial_end].
> - *		Caller has to lookup again for [*partial_end:end].
> +/**
> + * mtrr_type_lookup_fixed - look up memory type in MTRR fixed entries
> + *
> + * MTRR fixed entries are divided into the following ways:
> + *  0x00000 - 0x7FFFF : This range is divided into eight 64KB sub-ranges
> + *  0x80000 - 0xBFFFF : This range is divided into sixteen 16KB sub-ranges
> + *  0xC0000 - 0xFFFFF : This range is divided into sixty-four 4KB sub-ranges

No need for those - simply a pointer to either the SDM or APM manuals'
section suffices as they both describe it good.

> + *
> + * Return Values:
> + * MTRR_TYPE_(type)  - Matched memory type
> + * MTRR_TYPE_INVALID - Unmatched or fixed entries are disabled
>   */
> -static u8 __mtrr_type_lookup(u64 start, u64 end, u64 *partial_end, int *repeat)
> +static u8 mtrr_type_lookup_fixed(u64 start, u64 end)
> +{
> +	int idx;
> +
> +	if (start >= 0x100000)
> +		return MTRR_TYPE_INVALID;
> +
> +	if (!(mtrr_state.have_fixed) ||
> +	    !(mtrr_state.enabled & MTRR_STATE_MTRR_FIXED_ENABLED))
> +		return MTRR_TYPE_INVALID;
> +
> +	if (start < 0x80000) {		/* 0x0 - 0x7FFFF */
> +		idx = 0;
> +		idx += (start >> 16);
> +		return mtrr_state.fixed_ranges[idx];
> +
> +	} else if (start < 0xC0000) {	/* 0x80000 - 0xBFFFF */
> +		idx = 1 * 8;
> +		idx += ((start - 0x80000) >> 14);
> +		return mtrr_state.fixed_ranges[idx];
> +	}
> +
> +	/* 0xC0000 - 0xFFFFF */
> +	idx = 3 * 8;
> +	idx += ((start - 0xC0000) >> 12);
> +	return mtrr_state.fixed_ranges[idx];
> +}
> +
> +/**
> + * mtrr_type_lookup_variable - look up memory type in MTRR variable entries
> + *
> + * Return Value:
> + * MTRR_TYPE_(type) - Matched memory type or default memory type (unmatched)
> + *
> + * Output Argument:
> + * repeat - Set to 1 when [start:end] spanned across MTRR range and type
> + *	    returned corresponds only to [start:*partial_end].  Caller has
> + *	    to lookup again for [*partial_end:end].
> + */
> +static u8 mtrr_type_lookup_variable(u64 start, u64 end, u64 *partial_end,
> +				    int *repeat)
>  {
>  	int i;
>  	u64 base, mask;
>  	u8 prev_match, curr_match;
>  
>  	*repeat = 0;
> -	if (!mtrr_state_set)
> -		return MTRR_TYPE_INVALID;
> -
> -	if (!(mtrr_state.enabled & MTRR_STATE_MTRR_ENABLED))
> -		return MTRR_TYPE_INVALID;
>  
>  	/* Make end inclusive end, instead of exclusive */
>  	end--;
>  
> -	/* Look in fixed ranges. Just return the type as per start */
> -	if ((start < 0x100000) &&
> -	    (mtrr_state.have_fixed) &&
> -	    (mtrr_state.enabled & MTRR_STATE_MTRR_FIXED_ENABLED)) {
> -		int idx;
> -
> -		if (start < 0x80000) {
> -			idx = 0;
> -			idx += (start >> 16);
> -			return mtrr_state.fixed_ranges[idx];
> -		} else if (start < 0xC0000) {
> -			idx = 1 * 8;
> -			idx += ((start - 0x80000) >> 14);
> -			return mtrr_state.fixed_ranges[idx];
> -		} else {
> -			idx = 3 * 8;
> -			idx += ((start - 0xC0000) >> 12);
> -			return mtrr_state.fixed_ranges[idx];
> -		}
> -	}
> -
> -	/*
> -	 * Look in variable ranges
> -	 * Look of multiple ranges matching this address and pick type
> -	 * as per MTRR precedence
> -	 */
>  	prev_match = MTRR_TYPE_INVALID;
>  	for (i = 0; i < num_var_ranges; ++i) {
>  		unsigned short start_state, end_state, inclusive;
> @@ -179,7 +193,8 @@ static u8 __mtrr_type_lookup(u64 start, u64 end, u64 *partial_end, int *repeat)
>  			 * Return the type for first region and a pointer to
>  			 * the start of second region so that caller will
>  			 * lookup again on the second region.
> -			 * Note: This way we handle multiple overlaps as well.
> +			 * Note: This way we handle overlaps with multiple
> +			 * entries and the default type properly.
>  			 */
>  			if (start_state)
>  				*partial_end = base + get_mtrr_size(mask);
> @@ -208,21 +223,18 @@ static u8 __mtrr_type_lookup(u64 start, u64 end, u64 *partial_end, int *repeat)
>  			return curr_match;
>  	}
>  
> -	if (mtrr_tom2) {
> -		if (start >= (1ULL<<32) && (end < mtrr_tom2))
> -			return MTRR_TYPE_WRBACK;
> -	}
> -
>  	if (prev_match != MTRR_TYPE_INVALID)
>  		return prev_match;
>  
>  	return mtrr_state.def_type;
>  }
>  
> -/*
> - * Returns the effective MTRR type for the region
> - * Error return:
> - * MTRR_TYPE_INVALID - when MTRR is not enabled
> +/**
> + * mtrr_type_lookup - look up memory type in MTRR
> + *
> + * Return Values:
> + * MTRR_TYPE_(type)  - The effective MTRR type for the region
> + * MTRR_TYPE_INVALID - MTRR is disabled
>   */
>  u8 mtrr_type_lookup(u64 start, u64 end)
>  {
> @@ -230,22 +242,45 @@ u8 mtrr_type_lookup(u64 start, u64 end)
>  	int repeat;
>  	u64 partial_end;
>  
> -	type = __mtrr_type_lookup(start, end, &partial_end, &repeat);
> +	if (!mtrr_state_set)
> +		return MTRR_TYPE_INVALID;
> +
> +	if (!(mtrr_state.enabled & MTRR_STATE_MTRR_ENABLED))
> +		return MTRR_TYPE_INVALID;
> +
> +	/*
> +	 * Look up the fixed ranges first, which take priority over
> +	 * the variable ranges.
> +	 */
> +	type = mtrr_type_lookup_fixed(start, end);
> +	if (type != MTRR_TYPE_INVALID)
> +		return type;

Huh, why are we not looking at start?

I mean, fixed MTRRs cover the first 1MB so we can simply do:

        if ((start < 0x100000) &&
            (mtrr_state.have_fixed) &&
            (mtrr_state.enabled & MTRR_STATE_MTRR_FIXED_ENABLED))
		return mtrr_type_lookup_fixed(start, end);

and for all the other ranges we would do the variable lookup:

	type = mtrr_type_lookup_variable(start, end, &partial_end, &repeat);
	...

?

Although I don't know what the code is supposed to do when a region
starts in the fixed range and overlaps its end, i,e, something like
that:

	[ start ... 0x100000 ... end ]

The current code would return a fixed range index and that would be not
really correct.

OTOH, this has been like this forever so maybe we don't care...

-- 
Regards/Gruss,
    Boris.

ECO tip #101: Trim your mails when you reply.
--
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ