[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20150506142624.GM17717@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net>
Date: Wed, 6 May 2015 16:26:24 +0200
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To: "Martin K. Petersen" <martin.petersen@...cle.com>
Cc: Jens Axboe <axboe@...com>, Jeff Moyer <jmoyer@...hat.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org,
adilger@...ger.ca, david@...morbit.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] Support for write stream IDs
On Tue, May 05, 2015 at 06:09:18PM -0400, Martin K. Petersen wrote:
> >>>>> "Jens" == Jens Axboe <axboe@...com> writes:
>
> Jens> I'm not trying to make a shortcut. I deliberately do not want to
> Jens> make ID generation/assignment part of the kernel. There's no
> Jens> reason that can't exist outside of the kernel, in a libstreamid or
> Jens> similar.
>
> That just perpetuates the broken model, though. Why wouldn't we want to
> have stream ids readily available inside the kernel to tag journals,
> filesystem metadata, data migration, who knows what?
> The only sensible solution is for the kernel to manage the stream
> IDs. And for them to be plentiful. The storage device is free to ignore
> them, do LRU or whatever it pleases to manage them if it has an internal
> limit on number of open streams, etc.
I agree; one of the primary tasks of an operating system kernel is
arbitrage and control of hardware resources.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists