lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Wed, 6 May 2015 08:37:04 -0700
From:	Tyler Baker <tyler.baker@...aro.org>
To:	Shuah Khan <shuahkh@....samsung.com>
Cc:	Kevin Hilman <khilman@...nel.org>,
	John Stultz <john.stultz@...aro.org>,
	Darren Hart <dvhart@...radead.org>,
	David Herrmann <dh.herrmann@...il.com>,
	Michael Ellerman <mpe@...erman.id.au>,
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	linux-arm-kernel <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 0/7] selftests: fixes for installation and cross compilation

On 6 May 2015 at 08:23, Shuah Khan <shuahkh@....samsung.com> wrote:
> On 05/06/2015 08:49 AM, Tyler Baker wrote:
>> Hi Shuah,
>>
>> On 21 April 2015 at 15:49, Tyler Baker <tyler.baker@...aro.org> wrote:
>>> This patch set fixes various issues observed when cross building and
>>> installing selftests.
>>>
>>> As I began investigating improving the test output format, I performed an
>>> audit of the current tests to ensure all tests were able to execute on various
>>> target architectures. I found that some tests did not install their binaries
>>> and others required directories to be installed to execute properly. There
>>> were also cases in which tests were being installed when they were never built.
>>> With this series applied all tests compile when appropriate and install their
>>> output properly.
>>>
>>> I have tested this series by building, installing and deploying all selftests
>>> to x86, arm and arm64 targets.
>>>
>>> Changes v3 -> v4:
>>> * Planning to send a followup series to address the lib.mk issue so I've
>>> dropped the breakpoints and x86 installation workaround.
>>> * x86: Removed redundant else logic block.
>>> * Applied Andy Lutomirski's ACK to patches 4 and 5.
>>> * Rebased onto next-20150421.
>>
>> I believe all comments have been addressed, is there anything else you
>> would like to see?
>>
>>>
>>> Changes v2 -> v3:
>>> * 5/8: Removed duplicate all_32.
>>> * 6/8: Ensure the default rule is all in every case.
>>> * 6/8: Fixed commit message wording for better clarity.
>>> * Applied Michael Ellerman's ACK to patches 1-4, and 8 as they have not changed.
>>> * Rebased onto next-20150420.
>>>
>>> Changes v1 -> v2:
>>> * Have no dependency on all when CROSS_COMPILE is set. (Andy Lutomirski)
>>> * Added Andy on CC for all x86 test patches.
>>> * Split up the x86 patches for better clarity.
>>> * Rebased onto next-20150415.
>>>
>>> This series is based on next-20150421.
>>>
>>> Tyler Baker (7):
>>>   selftests: copy TEST_DIRS to INSTALL_PATH
>>>   selftests/ftrace: install test.d
>>>   selftests/kdbus: install kdbus-test
>>>   selftest/x86: build both bitnesses
>>>   selftest/x86: have no dependency on all when cross building
>>>   selftests/x86: install tests
>>>   selftests/exec: do not install subdir as it is already created
>>>
>>>  tools/testing/selftests/exec/Makefile   |  2 +-
>>>  tools/testing/selftests/ftrace/Makefile |  1 +
>>>  tools/testing/selftests/kdbus/Makefile  |  2 ++
>>>  tools/testing/selftests/lib.mk          |  3 +++
>>>  tools/testing/selftests/x86/Makefile    | 15 ++++++++++++---
>>>  5 files changed, 19 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>>>
>>> --
>>> 2.1.4
>>>
>>
>
> Patches are good. I will be applying these to linux-kselftest
> next in a day or two for 4.2

Excellent.

>
> Thanks for fixing these issues.

No problem, thanks for your consideration.

>
> -- Shuah
>
>
> --
> Shuah Khan
> Sr. Linux Kernel Developer
> Open Source Innovation Group
> Samsung Research America (Silicon Valley)
> shuahkh@....samsung.com | (970) 217-8978


Tyler
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ