linux-kernel - [PATCH RFC 02/15] mm, uaccess: trigger might_sleep() in might

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <1430934639-2131-3-git-send-email-dahi@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Date:	Wed,  6 May 2015 19:50:26 +0200
From:	David Hildenbrand <dahi@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
To:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc:	dahi@...ux.vnet.ibm.com, mingo@...hat.com, peterz@...radead.org,
	yang.shi@...driver.com, bigeasy@...utronix.de,
	benh@...nel.crashing.org, paulus@...ba.org,
	akpm@...ux-foundation.org, heiko.carstens@...ibm.com,
	schwidefsky@...ibm.com, borntraeger@...ibm.com, mst@...hat.com,
	tglx@...utronix.de, David.Laight@...LAB.COM, hughd@...gle.com,
	hocko@...e.cz, ralf@...ux-mips.org, herbert@...dor.apana.org.au,
	linux@....linux.org.uk, airlied@...ux.ie, daniel.vetter@...el.com,
	linux-mm@...ck.org, linux-arch@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH RFC 02/15] mm, uaccess: trigger might_sleep() in might_fault() with disabled pagefaults

Commit 662bbcb2747c ("mm, sched: Allow uaccess in atomic with
pagefault_disable()") removed might_sleep() checks for all user access
code (that uses might_fault()).

The reason was to disable wrong "sleep in atomic" warnings in the
following scenario:
    pagefault_disable()
    rc = copy_to_user(...)
    pagefault_enable()

Which is valid, as pagefault_disable() increments the preempt counter
and therefore disables the pagefault handler. copy_to_user() will not
sleep and return an error code if a page is not available.

However, as all might_sleep() checks are removed,
CONFIG_DEBUG_ATOMIC_SLEEP would no longer detect the following scenario:
    spin_lock(&lock);
    rc = copy_to_user(...)
    spin_unlock(&lock)

If the kernel is compiled with preemption turned on, preempt_disable()
will make in_atomic() detect disabled preemption. The fault handler would
correctly never sleep on user access.
However, with preemption turned off, preempt_disable() is usually a NOP
(with !CONFIG_PREEMPT_COUNT), therefore in_atomic() will not be able to
detect disabled preemption nor disabled pagefaults. The fault handler
could sleep.
We really want to enable CONFIG_DEBUG_ATOMIC_SLEEP checks for user access
functions again, otherwise we can end up with horrible deadlocks.

Root of all evil is that pagefault_disable() acts almost as
preempt_disable(), depending on preemption being turned on/off.

As we now have pagefault_disabled(), we can use it to distinguish
whether user acces functions might sleep.

Convert might_fault() into a makro that calls __might_fault(), to
allow proper file + line messages in case of a might_sleep() warning.

Signed-off-by: David Hildenbrand <dahi@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
---
 include/linux/kernel.h |  3 ++-
 mm/memory.c            | 18 ++++++------------
 2 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)

diff --git a/include/linux/kernel.h b/include/linux/kernel.h
index 3a5b48e..060dd7b 100644
--- a/include/linux/kernel.h
+++ b/include/linux/kernel.h
@@ -244,7 +244,8 @@ static inline u32 reciprocal_scale(u32 val, u32 ep_ro)
 
 #if defined(CONFIG_MMU) && \
 	(defined(CONFIG_PROVE_LOCKING) || defined(CONFIG_DEBUG_ATOMIC_SLEEP))
-void might_fault(void);
+#define might_fault() __might_fault(__FILE__, __LINE__)
+void __might_fault(const char *file, int line);
 #else
 static inline void might_fault(void) { }
 #endif
diff --git a/mm/memory.c b/mm/memory.c
index d1fa0c1..2ddd80a 100644
--- a/mm/memory.c
+++ b/mm/memory.c
@@ -3737,7 +3737,7 @@ void print_vma_addr(char *prefix, unsigned long ip)
 }
 
 #if defined(CONFIG_PROVE_LOCKING) || defined(CONFIG_DEBUG_ATOMIC_SLEEP)
-void might_fault(void)
+void __might_fault(const char *file, int line)
 {
 	/*
 	 * Some code (nfs/sunrpc) uses socket ops on kernel memory while
@@ -3747,21 +3747,15 @@ void might_fault(void)
 	 */
 	if (segment_eq(get_fs(), KERNEL_DS))
 		return;
-
-	/*
-	 * it would be nicer only to annotate paths which are not under
-	 * pagefault_disable, however that requires a larger audit and
-	 * providing helpers like get_user_atomic.
-	 */
-	if (in_atomic())
+	if (pagefault_disabled())
 		return;
-
-	__might_sleep(__FILE__, __LINE__, 0);
-
+	__might_sleep(file, line, 0);
+#if defined(CONFIG_DEBUG_ATOMIC_SLEEP)
 	if (current->mm)
 		might_lock_read(&current->mm->mmap_sem);
+#endif
 }
-EXPORT_SYMBOL(might_fault);
+EXPORT_SYMBOL(__might_fault);
 #endif
 
 #if defined(CONFIG_TRANSPARENT_HUGEPAGE) || defined(CONFIG_HUGETLBFS)
-- 
2.1.4

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/