[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20150507225226.GM2462@suse.de>
Date: Thu, 7 May 2015 23:52:26 +0100
From: Mel Gorman <mgorman@...e.de>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc: Waiman Long <waiman.long@...com>, Nathan Zimmer <nzimmer@....com>,
Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...el.com>,
Scott Norton <scott.norton@...com>,
Daniel J Blueman <daniel@...ascale.com>,
Linux-MM <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mm: meminit: Finish initialisation of struct pages
before basic setup
On Thu, May 07, 2015 at 03:09:32PM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Thu, 7 May 2015 08:25:18 +0100 Mel Gorman <mgorman@...e.de> wrote:
>
> > Waiman Long reported that 24TB machines hit OOM during basic setup when
> > struct page initialisation was deferred. One approach is to initialise memory
> > on demand but it interferes with page allocator paths. This patch creates
> > dedicated threads to initialise memory before basic setup. It then blocks
> > on a rw_semaphore until completion as a wait_queue and counter is overkill.
> > This may be slower to boot but it's simplier overall and also gets rid of a
> > section mangling which existed so kswapd could do the initialisation.
>
> Seems a reasonable compromise. It makes a bit of a mess of the patch
> sequencing.
>
> Have some tweaklets:
>
The tweaks are prefectly reasonable. As for the patch sequencing, I'm ok
with adding the patch on top if you are because that preserves the testing
history. If you're unhappy, I can shuffle it into a better place and resend
the full series that includes all the fixes so far.
Thanks.
--
Mel Gorman
SUSE Labs
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists