[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1430981678.2955.121.camel@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 07 May 2015 08:54:38 +0200
From: Mike Galbraith <umgwanakikbuti@...il.com>
To: "Oza (Pawandeep) Oza" <oza@...adcom.com>
Cc: pawandeep oza <oza.contri.linux.kernel@...il.com>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
malayasen rout <malayasen.rout@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [KERNEL BUG] do_timer/tick_handover_do_timer 3.10.17
On Thu, 2015-05-07 at 05:58 +0000, Oza (Pawandeep) Oza wrote:
> Yes.
> But dying kernel doesn’t mean it CAN NOT INCREMENT jiffies.
> do_timer should do the job until kernel takes its last breathe and more precisely CPU0 take its last breathe by halting itself as its last instruction.
Feel free to add a redundant timer subsystem lest we BUG() in there, and
whatever else you need to guarantee a perfect orderly death for your
box. I prefer live boxen, would make that BUG() go away.
-Mike
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists