linux-kernel - [PATCH 3.16.y-ckt 178/180] ext4: fix ZERO

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <1430991989-23170-179-git-send-email-luis.henriques@canonical.com>
Date:	Thu,  7 May 2015 10:46:27 +0100
From:	Luis Henriques <luis.henriques@...onical.com>
To:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, stable@...r.kernel.org,
	kernel-team@...ts.ubuntu.com
Cc:	Theodore Ts'o <tytso@....edu>,
	Namjae Jeon <namjae.jeon@...sung.com>,
	Moritz Muehlenhoff <jmm@...ian.org>,
	Luis Henriques <luis.henriques@...onical.com>
Subject: [PATCH 3.16.y-ckt 178/180] ext4: fix ZERO_RANGE bug hidden by flag aliasing

3.16.7-ckt11 -stable review patch.  If anyone has any objections, please let me know.

------------------

From: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@....edu>

commit 713e8dde3e71e92db2d8cc8459d236ce1fb576ce upstream.

We accidently aliased EXT4_EX_NOCACHE and EXT4_GET_CONVERT_UNWRITTEN
falgs, which apparently was hiding a bug that was unmasked when this
flag aliasing issue was addressed (see the subsequent commit).  The
reproduction case was:

   fsx -N 10000 -l 500000 -r 4096 -t 4096 -w 4096 -Z -R -W /vdb/junk

... which would cause fsx to report corruption in the data file.

The fix we have is a bit of an overkill, but I'd much rather be
conservative for now, and we can optimize ZERO_RANGE_FL handling
later.  The fact that we need to zap the extent_status cache for the
inode is unfortunate, but correctness is far more important than
performance.

Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@....edu>
Cc: Namjae Jeon <namjae.jeon@...sung.com>
Cc: Moritz Muehlenhoff <jmm@...ian.org>
Signed-off-by: Luis Henriques <luis.henriques@...onical.com>
---
 fs/ext4/extents.c | 21 ++++++++++++++-------
 1 file changed, 14 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)

diff --git a/fs/ext4/extents.c b/fs/ext4/extents.c
index 467661264ad0..2a4b4f3b1ae2 100644
--- a/fs/ext4/extents.c
+++ b/fs/ext4/extents.c
@@ -4796,7 +4796,8 @@ static long ext4_zero_range(struct file *file, loff_t offset,
 		max_blocks -= lblk;
 
 	flags = EXT4_GET_BLOCKS_CREATE_UNWRIT_EXT |
-		EXT4_GET_BLOCKS_CONVERT_UNWRITTEN;
+		EXT4_GET_BLOCKS_CONVERT_UNWRITTEN |
+		EXT4_EX_NOCACHE;
 	if (mode & FALLOC_FL_KEEP_SIZE)
 		flags |= EXT4_GET_BLOCKS_KEEP_SIZE;
 
@@ -4834,15 +4835,21 @@ static long ext4_zero_range(struct file *file, loff_t offset,
 		ext4_inode_block_unlocked_dio(inode);
 		inode_dio_wait(inode);
 
+		ret = ext4_alloc_file_blocks(file, lblk, max_blocks, new_size,
+					     flags, mode);
+		if (ret)
+			goto out_dio;
 		/*
 		 * Remove entire range from the extent status tree.
+		 *
+		 * ext4_es_remove_extent(inode, lblk, max_blocks) is
+		 * NOT sufficient.  I'm not sure why this is the case,
+		 * but let's be conservative and remove the extent
+		 * status tree for the entire inode.  There should be
+		 * no outstanding delalloc extents thanks to the
+		 * filemap_write_and_wait_range() call above.
 		 */
-		ret = ext4_es_remove_extent(inode, lblk, max_blocks);
-		if (ret)
-			goto out_dio;
-
-		ret = ext4_alloc_file_blocks(file, lblk, max_blocks, new_size,
-					     flags, mode);
+		ret = ext4_es_remove_extent(inode, 0, EXT_MAX_BLOCKS);
 		if (ret)
 			goto out_dio;
 	}
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/