linux-kernel - [PATCH 3.16.y-ckt 131/180] fs/binfmt_elf.c: fix bug in loading of PIE binaries

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <1430991989-23170-132-git-send-email-luis.henriques@canonical.com>
Date:	Thu,  7 May 2015 10:45:40 +0100
From:	Luis Henriques <luis.henriques@...onical.com>
To:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, stable@...r.kernel.org,
	kernel-team@...ts.ubuntu.com
Cc:	Michael Davidson <md@...gle.com>,
	Alexander Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>,
	Jiri Kosina <jkosina@...e.cz>,
	Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Luis Henriques <luis.henriques@...onical.com>
Subject: [PATCH 3.16.y-ckt 131/180] fs/binfmt_elf.c: fix bug in loading of PIE binaries

3.16.7-ckt11 -stable review patch.  If anyone has any objections, please let me know.

------------------

From: Michael Davidson <md@...gle.com>

commit a87938b2e246b81b4fb713edb371a9fa3c5c3c86 upstream.

With CONFIG_ARCH_BINFMT_ELF_RANDOMIZE_PIE enabled, and a normal top-down
address allocation strategy, load_elf_binary() will attempt to map a PIE
binary into an address range immediately below mm->mmap_base.

Unfortunately, load_elf_ binary() does not take account of the need to
allocate sufficient space for the entire binary which means that, while
the first PT_LOAD segment is mapped below mm->mmap_base, the subsequent
PT_LOAD segment(s) end up being mapped above mm->mmap_base into the are
that is supposed to be the "gap" between the stack and the binary.

Since the size of the "gap" on x86_64 is only guaranteed to be 128MB this
means that binaries with large data segments > 128MB can end up mapping
part of their data segment over their stack resulting in corruption of the
stack (and the data segment once the binary starts to run).

Any PIE binary with a data segment > 128MB is vulnerable to this although
address randomization means that the actual gap between the stack and the
end of the binary is normally greater than 128MB.  The larger the data
segment of the binary the higher the probability of failure.

Fix this by calculating the total size of the binary in the same way as
load_elf_interp().

Signed-off-by: Michael Davidson <md@...gle.com>
Cc: Alexander Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>
Cc: Jiri Kosina <jkosina@...e.cz>
Cc: Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Luis Henriques <luis.henriques@...onical.com>
---
 fs/binfmt_elf.c | 9 ++++++++-
 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/fs/binfmt_elf.c b/fs/binfmt_elf.c
index c10fc70e4912..44bdf7b200c3 100644
--- a/fs/binfmt_elf.c
+++ b/fs/binfmt_elf.c
@@ -752,6 +752,7 @@ static int load_elf_binary(struct linux_binprm *bprm)
 	    i < loc->elf_ex.e_phnum; i++, elf_ppnt++) {
 		int elf_prot = 0, elf_flags;
 		unsigned long k, vaddr;
+		unsigned long total_size = 0;

 		if (elf_ppnt->p_type != PT_LOAD)
 			continue;
@@ -816,10 +817,16 @@ static int load_elf_binary(struct linux_binprm *bprm)
 #else
 			load_bias = ELF_PAGESTART(ELF_ET_DYN_BASE - vaddr);
 #endif
+			total_size = total_mapping_size(elf_phdata,
+							loc->elf_ex.e_phnum);
+			if (!total_size) {
+				error = -EINVAL;
+				goto out_free_dentry;
+			}
 		}

 		error = elf_map(bprm->file, load_bias + vaddr, elf_ppnt,
-				elf_prot, elf_flags, 0);
+				elf_prot, elf_flags, total_size);
 		if (BAD_ADDR(error)) {
 			send_sig(SIGKILL, current, 0);
 			retval = IS_ERR((void *)error) ?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/