[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20150507114021.GH23123@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net>
Date: Thu, 7 May 2015 13:40:21 +0200
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
Cc: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@...ibm.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
David Hildenbrand <dahi@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, mingo@...hat.com,
yang.shi@...driver.com, bigeasy@...utronix.de,
benh@...nel.crashing.org, paulus@...ba.org,
heiko.carstens@...ibm.com, schwidefsky@...ibm.com, mst@...hat.com,
tglx@...utronix.de, David.Laight@...LAB.COM, hughd@...gle.com,
hocko@...e.cz, ralf@...ux-mips.org, herbert@...dor.apana.org.au,
linux@....linux.org.uk, airlied@...ux.ie, daniel.vetter@...el.com,
linux-mm@...ck.org, linux-arch@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC 00/15] decouple pagefault_disable() from
preempt_disable()
On Thu, May 07, 2015 at 01:08:28PM +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> Yes, but I'm wondering what I'm missing: is there any deep reason for
> making pagefaults-disabled sections non-atomic?
This all comes from -rt, where we had significant latencies due to these
things.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists