[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20150507132543.GA14889@verge.net.au>
Date: Thu, 7 May 2015 22:25:43 +0900
From: Simon Horman <horms@...ge.net.au>
To: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Cc: linux-sh@...r.kernel.org, Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Magnus Damm <magnus.damm@...il.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
LAK <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: Possible regression due to "hrtimer: Get rid of hrtimer softirq"
Hi Thomas,
On Thu, May 07, 2015 at 02:35:59PM +0200, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> On Thu, 7 May 2015, Simon Horman wrote:
> > ------------[ cut here ]------------
> > kernel BUG at kernel/irq_work.c:135!
>
> BUG_ON(!irqs_disabled());
>
> So something enables interrupts in the periodic tick handling
> machinery. Seems you have high resolution timers disabled, but nohz
> enabled. And that code path has a local_irq_disable/enable pair which
> causes havoc. Patch below.
Thanks for your quick response. I have been able to confirm that
when applied on top of next-20150507 the problem I observed no longer
manifests. I have successfully tested it on all the boards
where I previously observed a problem.
If you are planning to formally submit the patch below feel free to add:
Tested-by: Simon Horman <horms+renesas@...ge.net.au>
> diff --git a/kernel/time/tick-sched.c b/kernel/time/tick-sched.c
> index 753c211f6195..812f7a3b9898 100644
> --- a/kernel/time/tick-sched.c
> +++ b/kernel/time/tick-sched.c
> @@ -967,11 +967,9 @@ static void tick_nohz_switch_to_nohz(void)
> if (!tick_nohz_enabled)
> return;
>
> - local_irq_disable();
> - if (tick_switch_to_oneshot(tick_nohz_handler)) {
> - local_irq_enable();
> + if (tick_switch_to_oneshot(tick_nohz_handler))
> return;
> - }
> +
> tick_nohz_active = 1;
> ts->nohz_mode = NOHZ_MODE_LOWRES;
>
> @@ -986,7 +984,6 @@ static void tick_nohz_switch_to_nohz(void)
> hrtimer_forward_now(&ts->sched_timer, tick_period);
> hrtimer_set_expires(&ts->sched_timer, next);
> tick_program_event(next, 1);
> - local_irq_enable();
> }
>
> /*
> @@ -1171,7 +1168,7 @@ void tick_oneshot_notify(void)
> * Called cyclic from the hrtimer softirq (driven by the timer
> * softirq) allow_nohz signals, that we can switch into low-res nohz
> * mode, because high resolution timers are disabled (either compile
> - * or runtime).
> + * or runtime). Called with interrupts disabled.
> */
> int tick_check_oneshot_change(int allow_nohz)
> {
>
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> linux-arm-kernel mailing list
> linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
> http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists