[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAMAWPa_n+59+v+x3fKkmdtW1wMJF7kqtTjLLowmv1xwGWprYJw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 7 May 2015 08:17:19 -0700
From: Kevin Hilman <khilman@...nel.org>
To: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...eaurora.org>
Cc: Heiko Stübner <heiko@...ech.de>,
Mike Turquette <mturquette@...aro.org>,
Doug Anderson <dianders@...omium.org>,
linux-clk@...r.kernel.org, lkml <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@...e-electrons.com>,
Alex Elder <elder@...aro.org>,
Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@...e-electrons.com>,
Stephen Warren <swarren@...dotorg.org>,
Max Filippov <jcmvbkbc@...il.com>,
Sascha Hauer <kernel@...gutronix.de>,
Zhangfei Gao <zhangfei.gao@...aro.org>,
Santosh Shilimkar <ssantosh@...nel.org>,
Chao Xie <chao.xie@...vell.com>,
Jason Cooper <jason@...edaemon.net>,
Stefan Wahren <stefan.wahren@...e.com>,
Andrew Bresticker <abrestic@...omium.org>,
Robert Jarzmik <robert.jarzmik@...e.fr>,
Georgi Djakov <georgi.djakov@...aro.org>,
Sylwester Nawrocki <s.nawrocki@...sung.com>,
Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@...der.be>,
Barry Song <baohua@...nel.org>,
Dinh Nguyen <dinguyen@...nsource.altera.com>,
Viresh Kumar <viresh.linux@...il.com>,
Gabriel FERNANDEZ <gabriel.fernandez@...com>,
Emilio López <emilio@...pez.com.ar>,
Peter De Sc hrijver <pdeschrijver@...dia.com>,
Tero Kristo <t-kristo@...com>,
Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@...aro.org>,
Pawel Moll <pawel.moll@....com>,
Michal Simek <michal.simek@...inx.com>,
Olof Johansson <olof@...om.net>,
Tyler Baker <tyler.baker@...aro.org>,
Maxime Ripard <maxime.ripard@...e-electrons.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 0/2] clk: improve handling of orphan clocks
On Fri, May 1, 2015 at 4:40 PM, Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...eaurora.org> wrote:
> On 05/01/15 15:07, Heiko Stübner wrote:
>> Am Freitag, 1. Mai 2015, 13:52:47 schrieb Stephen Boyd:
>>
>>>> Instead I guess we could hook it less deep into clk_get_sys, like in the
>>>> following patch?
>>> It looks like it will work at least, but still I'd prefer to keep the
>>> orphan check contained to clk.c. How about this compile tested only patch?
>> I gave this a spin on my rk3288-firefly board. It still boots, the clock tree
>> looks the same and it also still defers nicely in the scenario I needed it
>> for. The implementation also looks nice - and of course much more compact than
>> my check in two places :-) . I don't know if you want to put this as follow-up
>> on top or fold it into the original orphan-check, so in any case
>>
>> Tested-by: Heiko Stuebner <heiko@...ech.de>
>> Reviewed-by: Heiko Stuebner <heiko@...ech.de>
>
> Thanks. I'm leaning towards tossing your patch 2/2 and replacing it with
> my patch and a note that it's based on an earlier patch from you.
It appears this has landed in linux-next in the form of 882667c1fcf1
clk: prevent orphan clocks from being used. A bunch of boot failures
for sunxi in today's linux-next[1] were bisected down to that patch.
I confirmed that reverting that commit on top of next/master gets
sunxi booting again.
Kevin
[1] http://kernelci.org/boot/all/job/next/kernel/next-20150507/
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists