[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20150507152011.47c8aa71@gandalf.local.home>
Date: Thu, 7 May 2015 15:20:11 -0400
From: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
To: Al Viro <viro@...IV.linux.org.uk>
Cc: David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] VFS: Add back check for !inode in walk_component()
On Thu, 7 May 2015 19:13:35 +0100
Al Viro <viro@...IV.linux.org.uk> wrote:
> On Thu, May 07, 2015 at 01:39:35PM -0400, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> > I had them printed in my previous traces. The flags were 0x200088, and
> > they were 0 just before the call.
>
> Not dentry->d_flags, nd->flags. Most interesting part is bit 6 in those
> (LOOKUP_RCU, 0x40).
nd->flags == 0x51
-- Steve
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists