linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 00/12] [RFC] x86: Memory Protection Keys

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <554BC1DC.3050303@sr71.net>
Date:	Thu, 07 May 2015 12:49:48 -0700
From:	Dave Hansen <dave@...1.net>
To:	Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@...ibm.com>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
CC:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, x86@...nel.org,
	linux-s390 <linux-s390@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/12] [RFC] x86: Memory Protection Keys

On 05/07/2015 12:45 PM, Christian Borntraeger wrote:
>>> >> This all looks like s390 storage keys (with the key in pagetables instead
>>> >> of a dedicated place). There we also have 16 values for the key and 4 bits 
>>> >> in the PSW that describe the thread local key both are matched.
>>> >> There is an additional field F (fetch protection) that decides, if the
>>> >> key value is used for stores or for stores+fetches.
>> > 
>> > OK, so a thread can only be in one domain at a time?
> Via the PSW yes.
> Actually the docs talk about access key, which is usually the PSW. There are
> some instructions like MOVE WITH KEY that allow to specify the key for this
> specific instruction. For compiled code these insructions are not used in 
> Linux and I can not really see a way to implement that properly. Furthermore
> enabling these key ops has other implications which are unwanted.

OK, so we have to basic operations that need to be done for
protection/storage/$FOO keys:

1. Assign a key (or set of keys) to a memory area
2. Have a thread request the access (read and/or write) to a set of
   areas be acquired or revoked.

For (2) on x86, we basically allow any combination of keys and r/w
permissions.  On s390, we would need to ensure that acces to only one
key was allowed at a time.

BTW, do the s390 keys affect instructions and data, or data only?

The x86 ones affect data only.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/