[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAMuHMdWXFmPWsL4QyjwV+X-mruS0pU2Uzj7aSSxTQDJ=K+32XA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 8 May 2015 08:47:44 +0200
From: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org>
To: Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>
Cc: York Sun <yorksun@...escale.com>,
Julia Lawall <Julia.Lawall@...6.fr>,
Linux I2C <linux-i2c@...r.kernel.org>, wolfram@...-dreams.de,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Why isn't IRQ shared for i2c-ocore
On Thu, May 7, 2015 at 9:01 AM, Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org> wrote:
>> I have a follow up question regarding interrupt. I see many I2C bus drivers
>> request interrupt with flag = 0. Why not using IRQF_SHARED?
>
> Probably because that particular IRQ is only used by the I2C
> Controller. I'm not exactly sure that you're getting at? Why do you
> think it should be shared? You should only flag it as shared if it
> is.
However, that's something the driver can't know.
Sharing interrupts is an integration property. The same IP core may share its
interrupt on one SoC, and not on another.
Gr{oetje,eeting}s,
Geert
--
Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert@...ux-m68k.org
In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But
when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that.
-- Linus Torvalds
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists