[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20150508103454.GA13160@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com>
Date: Fri, 8 May 2015 11:34:54 +0100
From: Nariman Poushin <nariman@...nsource.wolfsonmicro.com>
To: Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, patches@...nsource.wolfsonmicro.com
Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH] regmap: make REGCACHE_NONE maps return error on
regcache_sync
On Fri, May 08, 2015 at 11:20:19AM +0100, Mark Brown wrote:
> On Fri, May 08, 2015 at 10:55:37AM +0100, Nariman Poushin wrote:
> > Signed-off-by: Nariman Poushin <nariman@...nsource.wolfsonmicro.com>
> > ---
> > regcache currently causes a BUG_ON if cache_sync/sync_region is
> > called on a map with cache_type REGCACHE_NONE. This is not
> > consistent with the behaviour of regcache_read/write which
> > currently just return -ENOSYS and only throws a BUG_ON if
> > the cache_type is something that _should_ have cache ops,
> > but doesn't. Sure your device might not work, it but doesn't
> > seem right to panic the kernel. The other option I suppose
> > is to change it to a WARN_ON.
>
> Please submit patches in the format covered in SubmittingPatches, the
> changelog goes before the signoff.
>
Will do, apologies.
> The reason this is so loud is that while it's reasonable that generic
> code could end up triggering a write it's difficult to see any way in
> which a sync could be triggered on a device without a cache without it
> being an obvious bug. Since people frequently don't bother checking
> return codes loud log messages are our only real way of reporting this,
> given where syncs tend to happen it's not likely to happen in an obscure
> code path that won't get seen.
Fair enough, that makes sense.
Thanks
Nariman
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists