lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1431089718-25169-1-git-send-email-imunsie@au.ibm.com>
Date:	Fri,  8 May 2015 22:55:18 +1000
From:	"Ian Munsie" <imunsie@....ibm.com>
To:	mpe <mpe@...erman.id.au>
Cc:	benh <benh@...nel.crashing.org>, mikey <mikey@...ling.org>,
	linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	linuxppc-dev <linuxppc-dev@...abs.org>,
	Fei K Chen <uchen@...ibm.com>,
	Brian Allison <ballis@...ibm.com>,
	Ian Munsie <imunsie@....ibm.com>
Subject: [PATCH] cxl: Use call_rcu to reduce latency when releasing the afu fd

From: Ian Munsie <imunsie@....ibm.com>

The afu fd release path was identified as a significant bottleneck in
the overall performance of cxl. While an optimal AFU design would
minimise the need to close & reopen the AFU fd, it is not always
practical to avoid.

The bottleneck seems to be down to the call to synchronize_rcu(), which
will block until every other thread is guaranteed to be out of an RCU
critical section. Replace it with call_rcu() to free the context
structures later so we can return to the application sooner.

This reduces the time spent in the fd release path from 13356 usec to
13.3 usec - about a 100x speed up.

Reported-by: Fei K Chen <uchen@...ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Ian Munsie <imunsie@....ibm.com>
---
 drivers/misc/cxl/context.c | 15 ++++++++++-----
 drivers/misc/cxl/cxl.h     |  2 ++
 2 files changed, 12 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/misc/cxl/context.c b/drivers/misc/cxl/context.c
index 22eb338..cea299e 100644
--- a/drivers/misc/cxl/context.c
+++ b/drivers/misc/cxl/context.c
@@ -243,12 +243,9 @@ void cxl_context_detach_all(struct cxl_afu *afu)
 	mutex_unlock(&afu->contexts_lock);
 }
 
-void cxl_context_free(struct cxl_context *ctx)
+static void reclaim_ctx(struct rcu_head *rcu)
 {
-	mutex_lock(&ctx->afu->contexts_lock);
-	idr_remove(&ctx->afu->contexts_idr, ctx->pe);
-	mutex_unlock(&ctx->afu->contexts_lock);
-	synchronize_rcu();
+	struct cxl_context *ctx = container_of(rcu, struct cxl_context, rcu);
 
 	free_page((u64)ctx->sstp);
 	ctx->sstp = NULL;
@@ -256,3 +253,11 @@ void cxl_context_free(struct cxl_context *ctx)
 	put_pid(ctx->pid);
 	kfree(ctx);
 }
+
+void cxl_context_free(struct cxl_context *ctx)
+{
+	mutex_lock(&ctx->afu->contexts_lock);
+	idr_remove(&ctx->afu->contexts_idr, ctx->pe);
+	mutex_unlock(&ctx->afu->contexts_lock);
+	call_rcu(&ctx->rcu, reclaim_ctx);
+}
diff --git a/drivers/misc/cxl/cxl.h b/drivers/misc/cxl/cxl.h
index 47f655f..ebd2e0d 100644
--- a/drivers/misc/cxl/cxl.h
+++ b/drivers/misc/cxl/cxl.h
@@ -460,6 +460,8 @@ struct cxl_context {
 	bool pending_irq;
 	bool pending_fault;
 	bool pending_afu_err;
+
+	struct rcu_head rcu;
 };
 
 struct cxl {
-- 
2.1.4

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ