lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CANLsYkwT9zinP6KLi6o95+fGwPbxbUgWTpMnL7yZfsfTU8p31A@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Fri, 8 May 2015 08:07:39 -0600
From:	Mathieu Poirier <mathieu.poirier@...aro.org>
To:	Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>
Cc:	Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
	"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org" 
	<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
	"linux-api@...r.kernel.org" <linux-api@...r.kernel.org>,
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Kaixu Xia <kaixu.xia@...aro.org>,
	Chunyan Zhang <zhang.chunyan@...aro.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 01/11] coresight-etm4x: Adding CoreSight ETM4x driver

On 28 April 2015 at 06:28, Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org> wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 23, 2015 at 12:40 AM, Mathieu Poirier
> <mathieu.poirier@...aro.org> wrote:
>
>> From: Pratik Patel <pratikp@...eaurora.org>
>>
>> This driver manages the CoreSight ETMv4 (Embedded Trace Macrocell) IP block
>> to support HW assisted tracing on ARMv7 and ARMv8 architectures.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Pratik Patel <pratikp@...eaurora.org>
>> Signed-off-by: Kaixu Xia <xiakaixu@...wei.com>
>> Signed-off-by: Mathieu Poirier <mathieu.poirier@...aro.org>
>
> (...)
>> +/* The number of ETMv4 currently registered */
>> +static int etm4_count;
>> +static struct etmv4_drvdata *etmdrvdata[NR_CPUS];
>
> Don't you need a mutex or something around etm4_count so
> as to protect it? You could also make it an atomic.

Sorry for the late reply, your email got lost under the pile.

The etm4_count is only used at boot time to avoid registering the
notifiers twice and not used otherwise.  Since the discovery of
coresight devices is sequential there is no point in guarding it.

>
> Also why is it a signed int ... unsigned int?
>
> I know, lame comments, the runtime PM stuff looks perfect now,

I like it too - thanks for the review.

> someone had a refcount comment but it's doing the right thing.
>
> Yours,
> Linus Walleij
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ