[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <2131951.l0j0CIttAZ@wuerfel>
Date: Fri, 08 May 2015 18:08:16 +0200
From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
To: linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
Cc: Roman Yeryomin <roman@...em.lv>, Felix Fietkau <nbd@...nwrt.org>,
rtc-linux@...glegroups.com,
Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@...e-electrons.com>,
Russell King <rmk+kernel@....linux.org.uk>,
Hans Ulli Kroll <ulli.kroll@...glemail.com>
Subject: Re: [1/2] RTC: Add core rtc support for Gemini Soc devices
On Thursday 07 May 2015 12:03:25 Roman Yeryomin wrote:
> On 2015-05-06 22:22, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> > On Wednesday 06 May 2015 19:21:21 Roman Yeryomin wrote:
> >>
> >> > Thanks to point that, I'll merge that one which seems clean enough:
> >> > http://git.openwrt.org/?p=openwrt.git;a=blob;f=target/linux/gemini/files/drivers/rtc/rtc-gemini.c;h=587d8122b2fbb1230437eadcce4789a53aa60ee5;hb=4c637410a2a1ab45988e8ca6202554a502102039
> >>
> >> For 3.18 (and up) to work on gemini 160-gemini-timers.patch is vital.
> >> Without that timers are broken and cpu is super slow.
> >
> > Do you know what part of the patch is the actual bug fix? We should
> > probably
> > merge that separately and mark it for stable backports, while the bulk
> > of that
> > patch seems to just rearrange code.
> >
> > Arnd
>
> Sorry, didn't try to extract the exact lines it but I guess it's that
> part which touches the scheduler clock code.
> Because without that patch sched clock runs at 100Hz instead of 25MHz.
> I can dive into this deeper if you want, I just didn't see the need.
I think that would be helpful, yes.
Arnd
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists