[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1431105646-26558-2-git-send-email-shreyas@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Date: Fri, 8 May 2015 22:50:44 +0530
From: "Shreyas B. Prabhu" <shreyas@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: rostedt@...dmis.org, mingo@...hat.com,
aneesh.kumar@...ux.vnet.ibm.com, paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com,
preeti@...ux.vnet.ibm.com, mgorman@...e.de, namhyung@...nel.org,
lizf@...fujitsu.com, acme@...hat.com,
"Shreyas B. Prabhu" <shreyas@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Subject: [PATCH RESEND 1/3] tracing/mm: Don't trace kmem_cache_free on offline cpus
Since tracepoints use RCU for protection, they must not be called on
offline cpus. trace_kmem_cache_free can be called on an offline cpu in
this scenario caught by LOCKDEP:
===============================
[ INFO: suspicious RCU usage. ]
4.1.0-rc1+ #9 Not tainted
-------------------------------
include/trace/events/kmem.h:148 suspicious rcu_dereference_check() usage!
other info that might help us debug this:
RCU used illegally from offline CPU!
rcu_scheduler_active = 1, debug_locks = 1
no locks held by swapper/1/0.
stack backtrace:
CPU: 1 PID: 0 Comm: swapper/1 Not tainted 4.1.0-rc1+ #9
Call Trace:
[c000001fed2f78f0] [c0000000009dee8c] .dump_stack+0x98/0xd4 (unreliable)
[c000001fed2f7970] [c000000000128d88] .lockdep_rcu_suspicious+0x108/0x170
[c000001fed2f7a00] [c00000000026f924] .kmem_cache_free+0x344/0x4b0
[c000001fed2f7ab0] [c0000000000bd1cc] .__mmdrop+0x4c/0x160
[c000001fed2f7b40] [c0000000001068e0] .idle_task_exit+0xf0/0x100
[c000001fed2f7bc0] [c000000000066948] .pnv_smp_cpu_kill_self+0x58/0x2c0
[c000001fed2f7ca0] [c00000000003ce34] .cpu_die+0x34/0x50
[c000001fed2f7d10] [c0000000000176d0] .arch_cpu_idle_dead+0x20/0x40
[c000001fed2f7d80] [c00000000011f9a8] .cpu_startup_entry+0x708/0x7a0
[c000001fed2f7ec0] [c00000000003cb6c] .start_secondary+0x36c/0x3a0
[c000001fed2f7f90] [c000000000008b6c] start_secondary_prolog+0x10/0x14
Fix this by converting kmem_cache_free trace point into TRACE_EVENT_CONDITION
where condition is cpu_online(smp_processor_id())
Signed-off-by: Shreyas B. Prabhu <shreyas@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Reported-by: Aneesh Kumar K.V <aneesh.kumar@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Reviewed-by: Preeti U Murthy <preeti@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Acked-by: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
---
include/trace/events/kmem.h | 6 ++++--
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/include/trace/events/kmem.h b/include/trace/events/kmem.h
index 81ea598..dd9e612 100644
--- a/include/trace/events/kmem.h
+++ b/include/trace/events/kmem.h
@@ -140,11 +140,13 @@ DEFINE_EVENT(kmem_free, kfree,
TP_ARGS(call_site, ptr)
);
-DEFINE_EVENT(kmem_free, kmem_cache_free,
+DEFINE_EVENT_CONDITION(kmem_free, kmem_cache_free,
TP_PROTO(unsigned long call_site, const void *ptr),
- TP_ARGS(call_site, ptr)
+ TP_ARGS(call_site, ptr),
+
+ TP_CONDITION(cpu_online(smp_processor_id()))
);
TRACE_EVENT(mm_page_free,
--
1.9.3
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists