linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] ASoC: bt-sco: Add devicetree support for bt-sco codec

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20150508180644.GI2761@sirena.org.uk>
Date:	Fri, 8 May 2015 19:06:44 +0100
From:	Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
To:	Belisko Marek <marek.belisko@...il.com>
Cc:	Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@...il.com>, perex@...ex.cz, tiwai@...e.de,
	"devicetree@...r.kernel.org" <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, alsa-devel@...a-project.org,
	"Dr. H. Nikolaus Schaller" <hns@...delico.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ASoC: bt-sco: Add devicetree support for bt-sco codec

On Wed, May 06, 2015 at 09:38:55PM +0200, Belisko Marek wrote:

> > Is there any burning reason for adding the linux,bt-sco compatible?

> No no real reason just want to keep that if somebody would like use it from DT
> referenced by bt-sco entry (similar as platform data). I'm adding DT
> support for it because I want to use
> this for W2CBW003 chip and I can use simply "linux,bt-sco" property in
> DT or I instead of that add new vendor
> prefix + add new compatible entry which is IMO much harder that
> reference it by generic name.

OK, can you change the patch to just have the part specific name please?
If we were to have a generic binding it should really be richer than
this, for example I think I've seen BT devices that take in 16kHz
streams rather than 8kHz and there are often requirements for oversized
data frames as well.

Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (474 bytes)