[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <554CFFEB.1010703@kernel.org>
Date: Sat, 09 May 2015 03:26:51 +0900
From: Kukjin Kim <kgene@...nel.org>
To: Krzysztof Kozlowski <k.kozlowski@...sung.com>
CC: Kukjin Kim <kgene@...nel.org>,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-samsung-soc@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Olof Johansson <olof@...om.net>, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
Subject: Re: ARM: EXYNOS: Fixes for 4.1
On 05/06/15 09:55, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> Dear Kukjin,
>
> This groups important fix for current RC cycle. The patch was present
> on mailing list for quite long. It was tested. We had some
> disagreements about the solution but during discussion better ways for
> solving the issue were not presented.
>
> Best regards,
> Krzysztof
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------
>
> The following changes since commit 5ebe6afaf0057ac3eaeb98defd5456894b446d22:
>
> Linux 4.1-rc2 (2015-05-03 19:22:23 -0700)
>
> are available in the git repository at:
>
> https://github.com/krzk/linux.git tags/samsung-fixes-4.1
>
> for you to fetch changes up to 23e15018316e949c534cc32e46502f3080dfc970:
>
> ARM: EXYNOS: Fix failed second suspend on Exynos4 (2015-05-05 19:17:58 +0900)
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------
> Fixes failed second suspend to RAM on Exynos4412 based Trats2 board. This has
> shown up after enabling L2 cache but actually the "use delayed reset assertion"
> feature is to be blamed.
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------
> Krzysztof Kozlowski (1):
> ARM: EXYNOS: Fix failed second suspend on Exynos4
>
> arch/arm/mach-exynos/common.h | 2 ++
> arch/arm/mach-exynos/exynos.c | 27 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> arch/arm/mach-exynos/platsmp.c | 39 ++-------------------------------------
> arch/arm/mach-exynos/suspend.c | 3 +++
> 4 files changed, 34 insertions(+), 37 deletions(-)
> --
Hi Krzysztof,
Yeah, the patch is old thing but if I remember correctly, I couldn't
apply it because of soc_is_xxx() macro. Yes, I agree with the way,
firstly fix something and if required, then update it later....But!
Please address comments about that, if not, it will not be accepted by
arm-soc tree.
Thanks,
Kukjin
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists