[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20150508124203.6679b1d35ad9555425003929@linux-foundation.org>
Date: Fri, 8 May 2015 12:42:03 -0700
From: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
To: Eric B Munson <emunson@...mai.com>
Cc: Shuah Khan <shuahkh@....samsung.com>, linux-alpha@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-mips@...ux-mips.org,
linux-parisc@...r.kernel.org, linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org,
sparclinux@...r.kernel.org, linux-xtensa@...ux-xtensa.org,
linux-mm@...ck.org, linux-arch@...r.kernel.org,
linux-api@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/3] Allow user to request memory to be locked on page
fault
On Fri, 8 May 2015 15:33:43 -0400 Eric B Munson <emunson@...mai.com> wrote:
> mlock() allows a user to control page out of program memory, but this
> comes at the cost of faulting in the entire mapping when it is
> allocated. For large mappings where the entire area is not necessary
> this is not ideal.
>
> This series introduces new flags for mmap() and mlockall() that allow a
> user to specify that the covered are should not be paged out, but only
> after the memory has been used the first time.
Please tell us much much more about the value of these changes: the use
cases, the behavioural improvements and performance results which the
patchset brings to those use cases, etc.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists