[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.11.1505080022340.26907@vincent-weaver-1.umelst.maine.edu>
Date: Fri, 8 May 2015 00:25:50 -0400 (EDT)
From: Vince Weaver <vincent.weaver@...ne.edu>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
cc: Stephane Eranian <eranian@...gle.com>,
Vince Weaver <vincent.weaver@...ne.edu>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...nel.org>,
Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...hat.com>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
Paul Mackerras <paulus@...ba.org>
Subject: Re: perf: fuzzer triggers NULL pointer derefreence in
x86_schedule_events
On Thu, 7 May 2015, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> Indeed so; and we can make an analogous argument for hwc. However:
>
> > I think it is more likely related to the bitmask (idxmsk). But then
> > it is always allocated with the constraint even with the HT bug
> > workaround. So most, likely the index is bogus and you touch outside
> > the idxmsk[] array.
>
> [428232.701319] BUG: unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at (null)
>
> But the thing really tried to touch NULL, not some random address that
> faulted.
>
> As always, Vince has found us a good puzzle ;-)
and sorry I haven't been much help tracking it down. I'm trying to
trigger it again, but this particular bug only pops up after a week or so
of fuzzing.
Vince
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists