[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <554D6500.4070106@collabora.co.uk>
Date: Sat, 09 May 2015 03:38:08 +0200
From: Javier Martinez Canillas <javier.martinez@...labora.co.uk>
To: Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>
CC: Gwendal Grignou <gwendal@...omium.org>,
Olof Johansson <olof@...om.net>,
Doug Anderson <dianders@...omium.org>,
Bill Richardson <wfrichar@...omium.org>,
Simon Glass <sjg@...gle.com>,
Stephen Barber <smbarber@...omium.org>,
Filipe Brandenburger <filbranden@...gle.com>,
Todd Broch <tbroch@...omium.org>,
linux-samsung-soc@...r.kernel.org,
Linux Kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [RESEND PATCH 1/8] mfd: cros ec: Remove parent field
Hello Lee,
On 05/05/2015 12:54 PM, Lee Jones wrote:
> On Tue, 05 May 2015, Javier Martinez Canillas wrote:
>> On 04/29/2015 12:37 PM, Lee Jones wrote:
>> > On Thu, 23 Apr 2015, Gwendal Grignou wrote:
>> >
>> >> Be consistent, use cros_ec instead of "cros ec" or "cros-ec".
>> >
>> > What is this in reference to?
>> >
>>
>> I think Gwendal meant that I should be consistent in general and was not
>> referring to this patch particular.
>
> Better to quote one of the offending occurrences than to randomly
> top-post helpful comments.
>
Just for clarification, on a second read I noticed that Gwendal was talking
about the subject line since $subject uses "mfd: cros ec" as a prefix while
most of the commits in the subsystem (and in the series) use "mfd: cros_ec".
Also, there is another patch (5/8) that used "mfd: cros-ec" so he is right
that I should had used cros_ec consistently.
Sorry for missing that and I will fix when posting v2.
Best regards,
Javier
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists