lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <7884557.lRUSRr1Rsc@vostro.rjw.lan>
Date:	Sun, 10 May 2015 01:18:46 +0200
From:	"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>
To:	Preeti U Murthy <preeti@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>, peterz@...radead.org
Cc:	tglx@...utronix.de, rafael.j.wysocki@...el.com,
	daniel.lezcano@...aro.org, rlippert@...gle.com,
	linux-pm@...r.kernel.org, linus.walleij@...aro.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, mingo@...hat.com,
	sudeep.holla@....com, linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org
Subject: [PATCH 2/3] sched / idle: Call default_idle_call() from cpuidle_enter_state()

From: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@...el.com>

The check of the cpuidle_enter() return value against -EBUSY
made in call_cpuidle() will not be necessary any more if
cpuidle_enter_state() calls default_idle_call() directly when it
is about to return -EBUSY, so make that happen and eliminate the
check.

Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@...el.com>
---
 drivers/cpuidle/cpuidle.c |    4 +++-
 include/linux/cpuidle.h   |    1 +
 kernel/sched/idle.c       |   20 +++++++-------------
 3 files changed, 11 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)

Index: linux-pm/drivers/cpuidle/cpuidle.c
===================================================================
--- linux-pm.orig/drivers/cpuidle/cpuidle.c
+++ linux-pm/drivers/cpuidle/cpuidle.c
@@ -167,8 +167,10 @@ int cpuidle_enter_state(struct cpuidle_d
 	 * local timer will be shut down.  If a local timer is used from another
 	 * CPU as a broadcast timer, this call may fail if it is not available.
 	 */
-	if (broadcast && tick_broadcast_enter())
+	if (broadcast && tick_broadcast_enter()) {
+		default_idle_call();
 		return -EBUSY;
+	}
 
 	/* Take note of the planned idle state. */
 	sched_idle_set_state(target_state);
Index: linux-pm/kernel/sched/idle.c
===================================================================
--- linux-pm.orig/kernel/sched/idle.c
+++ linux-pm/kernel/sched/idle.c
@@ -76,12 +76,13 @@ void __weak arch_cpu_idle(void)
 	local_irq_enable();
 }
 
-static void default_idle_call(void)
+/**
+ * default_idle_call - Default CPU idle routine.
+ *
+ * To use when the cpuidle framework cannot be used.
+ */
+void default_idle_call(void)
 {
-	/*
-	 * We can't use the cpuidle framework, let's use the default idle
-	 * routine.
-	 */
 	if (current_clr_polling_and_test())
 		local_irq_enable();
 	else
@@ -91,8 +92,6 @@ static void default_idle_call(void)
 static int call_cpuidle(struct cpuidle_driver *drv, struct cpuidle_device *dev,
 		      int next_state)
 {
-	int entered_state;
-
 	/* Fall back to the default arch idle method on errors. */
 	if (next_state < 0) {
 		default_idle_call();
@@ -114,12 +113,7 @@ static int call_cpuidle(struct cpuidle_d
 	 * This function will block until an interrupt occurs and will take
 	 * care of re-enabling the local interrupts
 	 */
-	entered_state = cpuidle_enter(drv, dev, next_state);
-
-	if (entered_state == -EBUSY)
-		default_idle_call();
-
-	return entered_state;
+	return cpuidle_enter(drv, dev, next_state);
 }
 
 /**
Index: linux-pm/include/linux/cpuidle.h
===================================================================
--- linux-pm.orig/include/linux/cpuidle.h
+++ linux-pm/include/linux/cpuidle.h
@@ -202,6 +202,7 @@ static inline struct cpuidle_driver *cpu
 
 /* kernel/sched/idle.c */
 extern void sched_idle_set_state(struct cpuidle_state *idle_state);
+extern void default_idle_call(void);
 
 #ifdef CONFIG_ARCH_NEEDS_CPU_IDLE_COUPLED
 void cpuidle_coupled_parallel_barrier(struct cpuidle_device *dev, atomic_t *a);

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ