linux-kernel - [PATCH 4.0 01/72] bpf: fix 64-bit divide

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20150511175437.155502046@linuxfoundation.org>
Date:	Mon, 11 May 2015 10:54:07 -0700
From:	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc:	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
	stable@...r.kernel.org,
	Michael Holzheu <holzheu@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>,
	Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...mgrid.com>,
	"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>
Subject: [PATCH 4.0 01/72] bpf: fix 64-bit divide

4.0-stable review patch.  If anyone has any objections, please let me know.

------------------

From: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...mgrid.com>

[ Upstream commit 876a7ae65b86d8cec8efe7d15d050ac61116874e ]

ALU64_DIV instruction should be dividing 64-bit by 64-bit,
whereas do_div() does 64-bit by 32-bit divide.
x64 and arm64 JITs correctly implement 64 by 64 unsigned divide.
llvm BPF backend emits code assuming that ALU64_DIV does 64 by 64.

Fixes: 89aa075832b0 ("net: sock: allow eBPF programs to be attached to sockets")
Reported-by: Michael Holzheu <holzheu@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Acked-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...mgrid.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
---
 kernel/bpf/core.c |   12 ++++++------
 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)

--- a/kernel/bpf/core.c
+++ b/kernel/bpf/core.c
@@ -357,8 +357,8 @@ select_insn:
 	ALU64_MOD_X:
 		if (unlikely(SRC == 0))
 			return 0;
-		tmp = DST;
-		DST = do_div(tmp, SRC);
+		div64_u64_rem(DST, SRC, &tmp);
+		DST = tmp;
 		CONT;
 	ALU_MOD_X:
 		if (unlikely(SRC == 0))
@@ -367,8 +367,8 @@ select_insn:
 		DST = do_div(tmp, (u32) SRC);
 		CONT;
 	ALU64_MOD_K:
-		tmp = DST;
-		DST = do_div(tmp, IMM);
+		div64_u64_rem(DST, IMM, &tmp);
+		DST = tmp;
 		CONT;
 	ALU_MOD_K:
 		tmp = (u32) DST;
@@ -377,7 +377,7 @@ select_insn:
 	ALU64_DIV_X:
 		if (unlikely(SRC == 0))
 			return 0;
-		do_div(DST, SRC);
+		DST = div64_u64(DST, SRC);
 		CONT;
 	ALU_DIV_X:
 		if (unlikely(SRC == 0))
@@ -387,7 +387,7 @@ select_insn:
 		DST = (u32) tmp;
 		CONT;
 	ALU64_DIV_K:
-		do_div(DST, IMM);
+		DST = div64_u64(DST, IMM);
 		CONT;
 	ALU_DIV_K:
 		tmp = (u32) DST;


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/