[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <3644541.vBsSXgpCaS@tauon>
Date: Mon, 11 May 2015 09:30:11 +0200
From: Stephan Mueller <smueller@...onox.de>
To: Herbert Xu <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au>
Cc: pebolle@...cali.nl, andreas.steffen@...ongswan.org, tytso@....edu,
sandyinchina@...il.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-crypto@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 1/5] random: Async and sync API for accessing nonblocking_pool
Am Montag, 11. Mai 2015, 14:57:14 schrieb Herbert Xu:
Hi Herbert,
>
>There are two problems with this patch:
>
>1) The interface is way too complicated for a once off wait used
>only during boot. Really there is no need for cancellations.
I will remove that in the next installment. But that means that the DRBG
kernel module (or any other module) cannot be unloaded until the work
completes.
>
>2) There is potential for deadlock because you schedule a work that
>then sits around until the entropy is available. What if whatever
>is generating that entropy used the same work thread in future?
>
>So I suggest instead an interface that simply schedules a work
>when the entropy is available.
Are you suggesting to only leave get_blocking_random_bytes and have the caller
implementing the appropriate synchronous wait or async work?
Ciao
Stephan
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists