[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20150511075447.GA4290@dhcp-128-28.nay.redhat.com>
Date: Mon, 11 May 2015 15:54:47 +0800
From: Baoquan He <bhe@...hat.com>
To: AKASHI Takahiro <takahiro.akashi@...aro.org>
Cc: catalin.marinas@....com, will.deacon@....com, vgoyal@...hat.com,
hbabus@...ibm.com, geoff@...radead.org, broonie@...nel.org,
david.griego@...aro.org, kexec@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
linaro-kernel@...ts.linaro.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [v2 1/5] arm64: kdump: reserve memory for crash dump kernel
On 05/11/15 at 04:38pm, AKASHI Takahiro wrote:
> Hi Baoquan,
>
> On 04/28/2015 06:19 PM, Baoquan He wrote:
> >>+#ifdef CONFIG_CRASH_DUMP
> >>+/*
> >>+ * reserve_elfcorehdr() - reserves memory for elf core header
> >>+ *
> >>+ * This function reserves memory area given in "elfcorehdr=" kernel command
> >>+ * line parameter. The memory reserved is used by a dump capture kernel to
> >>+ * identify the memory used by primary kernel.
> >>+ */
> >
> >Hi AKASHI,
> >
> >May I know why elfcorehdr need be reserved separately but not locate a
> >memory region in crashkernel reserved region like all other ARCHs? Is
> >there any special reason?
>
> I don't get your point, but arm as well as arm64 locates elfcorehdr
> in a crash kernel's memory region.
> See kexec/arch/arm{,64}/crashdump-arm{,64}.c in kexec-tools.
>
> And this region is reserved at boot time *on crash kernel* because we don't want
> to corrupt it accidentally.
> (After Mark's comment, we might better remove the mmu mapping for this region, too.)
Sorry, I don't make myself clear.
In this patch you reserve a separate memory region in 1st kernel to
store elfcorehdr. I am wondering why you don't call add_buffer in
kexec-tools directly. Like this you can get a region from reserved
crashkernel region. Then you don't need reserve_elfcorehdr() to reserve
memory for elfcorehdr specifically. Like other ARCHs do only one memory
region is reserved in 1st kernel, that's crashkernel region.
Thanks
Baoquan
>
>
> Make sense?
>
> -Takahiro AKASHI
>
> >Thanks
> >Baoquan
> >
> >>+static void __init reserve_elfcorehdr(void)
> >>+{
> >>+ if (!elfcorehdr_size)
> >>+ return;
> >>+
> >>+ if (memblock_is_region_reserved(elfcorehdr_addr, elfcorehdr_size)) {
> >>+ pr_warn("elfcorehdr reservation failed - memory is in use (0x%llx)\n",
> >>+ elfcorehdr_addr);
> >>+ return;
> >>+ }
> >>+
> >>+ if (memblock_reserve(elfcorehdr_addr, elfcorehdr_size)) {
> >>+ pr_warn("elfcorehdr reservation failed - out of memory\n");
> >>+ return;
> >>+ }
> >>+
> >>+ pr_info("Reserving %lldKB of memory at %lldMB for elfcorehdr\n",
> >>+ elfcorehdr_size >> 10, elfcorehdr_addr >> 20);
> >>+}
> >>+#endif /* CONFIG_CRASH_DUMP */
> >> /*
> >> * Return the maximum physical address for ZONE_DMA (DMA_BIT_MASK(32)). It
> >> * currently assumes that for memory starting above 4G, 32-bit devices will
> >>@@ -170,6 +247,13 @@ void __init arm64_memblock_init(void)
> >> memblock_reserve(__virt_to_phys(initrd_start), initrd_end - initrd_start);
> >> #endif
> >>
> >>+#ifdef CONFIG_KEXEC
> >>+ reserve_crashkernel(memory_limit);
> >>+#endif
> >>+#ifdef CONFIG_CRASH_DUMP
> >>+ reserve_elfcorehdr();
> >>+#endif
> >>+
> >> early_init_fdt_scan_reserved_mem();
> >>
> >> /* 4GB maximum for 32-bit only capable devices */
> >>--
> >>1.7.9.5
> >>
> >>--
> >>To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
> >>the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
> >>More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> >>Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists