| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Mon, 11 May 2015 17:35:52 +0800
From: Lai Jiangshan <laijs@...fujitsu.com>
To: <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
CC: Lai Jiangshan <laijs@...fujitsu.com>, Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
Subject: [PATCH 5/5] workqueue: remove no_numa from workqueue_attrs
The structure workqueue_attrs is used both on workqueue and worker_pool,
but ->no_numa isn't a property of a worker_pool and requires special
comments or code when it is used on worker_pool.
This patch simply removes ->no_numa from workqueue_attrs along with
the special comments and code. The numa affinity is stored at
wq->numa instead.
Signed-off-by: Lai Jiangshan <laijs@...fujitsu.com>
---
kernel/workqueue.c | 44 ++++++++++++++------------------------------
1 file changed, 14 insertions(+), 30 deletions(-)
diff --git a/kernel/workqueue.c b/kernel/workqueue.c
index b08df98..42721a2 100644
--- a/kernel/workqueue.c
+++ b/kernel/workqueue.c
@@ -108,15 +108,10 @@ enum {
/*
* A struct for workqueue attributes. This can be used to change
* attributes of an unbound workqueue.
- *
- * Unlike other fields, ->no_numa isn't a property of a worker_pool. It
- * only modifies how apply_workqueue_attrs() select pools and thus doesn't
- * participate in pool hash calculations or equality comparisons.
*/
struct workqueue_attrs {
int nice; /* nice level */
cpumask_var_t cpumask; /* allowed CPUs */
- bool no_numa; /* disable NUMA affinity */
};
/*
@@ -267,8 +262,10 @@ struct workqueue_struct {
int nr_drainers; /* WQ: drain in progress */
int saved_max_active; /* WQ: saved pwq max_active */
- struct workqueue_attrs *unbound_attrs; /* PW: only for unbound wqs */
- struct pool_workqueue *dfl_pwq; /* PW: only for unbound wqs */
+ /* The following fields are only for unbound wqs. */
+ struct workqueue_attrs *unbound_attrs; /* PW: configure attrs */
+ bool numa; /* PW: enable per-node pwqs */
+ struct pool_workqueue *dfl_pwq; /* PW: the default pwq */
#ifdef CONFIG_SYSFS
struct wq_device *wq_dev; /* I: for sysfs interface */
@@ -3069,12 +3066,6 @@ static void copy_workqueue_attrs(struct workqueue_attrs *to,
{
to->nice = from->nice;
cpumask_copy(to->cpumask, from->cpumask);
- /*
- * Unlike hash and equality test, this function doesn't ignore
- * ->no_numa as it is used for both pool and wq attrs. Instead,
- * get_unbound_pool() explicitly clears ->no_numa after copying.
- */
- to->no_numa = from->no_numa;
}
/* hash value of the content of @attr */
@@ -3265,12 +3256,6 @@ static struct worker_pool *get_unbound_pool(const struct workqueue_attrs *attrs)
lockdep_set_subclass(&pool->lock, 1); /* see put_pwq() */
copy_workqueue_attrs(pool->attrs, attrs);
- /*
- * no_numa isn't a worker_pool attribute, always clear it. See
- * 'struct workqueue_attrs' comments for detail.
- */
- pool->attrs->no_numa = false;
-
/* if cpumask is contained inside a NUMA node, we belong to that node */
if (wq_numa_enabled) {
for_each_node(node) {
@@ -3491,8 +3476,8 @@ alloc_node_unbound_pwq(struct workqueue_struct *wq,
/*
* We don't wanna alloc/free wq_attrs for each call. Let's use a
* preallocated one. It is protected by wq_pool_mutex.
- * tmp_attrs->cpumask will be updated in next and tmp_attrs->no_numa
- * is not used, so we just need to initialize tmp_attrs->nice;
+ * tmp_attrs->cpumask will be updated in next, so we just need
+ * to initialize tmp_attrs->nice;
*/
tmp_attrs = wq_update_unbound_numa_attrs_buf;
tmp_attrs->nice = attrs->nice;
@@ -3552,6 +3537,7 @@ static struct pool_workqueue *numa_pwq_tbl_install(struct workqueue_struct *wq,
struct apply_wqattrs_ctx {
struct workqueue_struct *wq; /* target workqueue */
struct workqueue_attrs *attrs; /* attrs to apply */
+ bool numa; /* enalbe per-node pwqs */
struct list_head list; /* queued for batching commit */
struct pool_workqueue *dfl_pwq;
struct pool_workqueue *pwq_tbl[];
@@ -3598,7 +3584,6 @@ apply_wqattrs_prepare(struct workqueue_struct *wq,
*/
cpumask_and(new_attrs->cpumask, cpumask, wq_unbound_cpumask);
new_attrs->nice = nice;
- new_attrs->no_numa = !numa;
if (unlikely(cpumask_empty(new_attrs->cpumask)))
cpumask_copy(new_attrs->cpumask, wq_unbound_cpumask);
@@ -3622,6 +3607,7 @@ apply_wqattrs_prepare(struct workqueue_struct *wq,
/* save the user configured attrs and sanitize it. */
cpumask_and(new_attrs->cpumask, cpumask, cpu_possible_mask);
ctx->attrs = new_attrs;
+ ctx->numa = numa;
ctx->wq = wq;
return ctx;
@@ -3641,6 +3627,7 @@ static void apply_wqattrs_commit(struct apply_wqattrs_ctx *ctx)
mutex_lock(&ctx->wq->mutex);
copy_workqueue_attrs(ctx->wq->unbound_attrs, ctx->attrs);
+ ctx->wq->numa = ctx->numa;
/* save the previous pwq and install the new one */
for_each_node(node)
@@ -3760,8 +3747,7 @@ static void wq_update_unbound_numa(struct workqueue_struct *wq, int cpu,
lockdep_assert_held(&wq_pool_mutex);
- if (!wq_numa_enabled || !(wq->flags & WQ_UNBOUND) ||
- wq->unbound_attrs->no_numa)
+ if (!wq_numa_enabled || !(wq->flags & WQ_UNBOUND) || !wq->numa)
return;
pwq = alloc_node_unbound_pwq(wq, wq->dfl_pwq, true, node, cpu_off,
@@ -4778,8 +4764,7 @@ static int workqueue_apply_unbound_cpumask(void)
continue;
ctx = apply_wqattrs_prepare(wq, wq->unbound_attrs->cpumask,
- wq->unbound_attrs->nice,
- !wq->unbound_attrs->no_numa);
+ wq->unbound_attrs->nice, wq->numa);
if (!ctx) {
ret = -ENOMEM;
break;
@@ -4951,7 +4936,7 @@ static ssize_t wq_nice_store(struct device *dev, struct device_attribute *attr,
apply_wqattrs_lock();
ret = apply_workqueue_attrs_locked(wq, wq->unbound_attrs->cpumask,
- nice, !wq->unbound_attrs->no_numa);
+ nice, wq->numa);
apply_wqattrs_unlock();
return ret ?: count;
@@ -4986,7 +4971,7 @@ static ssize_t wq_cpumask_store(struct device *dev,
apply_wqattrs_lock();
ret = apply_workqueue_attrs_locked(wq, cpumask, wq->unbound_attrs->nice,
- !wq->unbound_attrs->no_numa);
+ wq->numa);
apply_wqattrs_unlock();
free_cpumask_var(cpumask);
@@ -5000,8 +4985,7 @@ static ssize_t wq_numa_show(struct device *dev, struct device_attribute *attr,
int written;
mutex_lock(&wq->mutex);
- written = scnprintf(buf, PAGE_SIZE, "%d\n",
- !wq->unbound_attrs->no_numa);
+ written = scnprintf(buf, PAGE_SIZE, "%d\n", wq->numa);
mutex_unlock(&wq->mutex);
return written;
--
2.1.0
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists