[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CACRpkdYXGfhwo1awUThbc4F7muMny-ZZrzDrg4Vmf=iow4UocA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 11 May 2015 11:58:29 +0200
From: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>
To: Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@...ux.intel.com>,
Wolfram Sang <wsa@...-dreams.de>
Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>,
Alexandre Courbot <gnurou@...il.com>,
Octavian Purdila <octavian.purdila@...el.com>,
Robert Dolca <robert.dolca@...el.com>,
"linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org" <linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
ACPI Devel Maling List <linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-i2c@...r.kernel.org" <linux-i2c@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/3] i2c / ACPI: Use 0 to indicate that device does not
have interrupt assigned
On Wed, May 6, 2015 at 12:29 PM, Mika Westerberg
<mika.westerberg@...ux.intel.com> wrote:
> This is the convention used in most parts of the kernel including DT
> counterpart of I2C slave enumeration. To make things consistent do the same
> for ACPI I2C slave enumeration path as well.
>
> Signed-off-by: Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@...ux.intel.com>
This needs to go through the GPIO tree along with 3/3.
Wolfram, can I have your ACK on this patch?
Yours,
Linus Walleij
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists