linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 0/5] Add proper support for Compulab CM-A510/SBC-A510

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <5550A760.9080200@free-electrons.com>
Date:	Mon, 11 May 2015 14:58:08 +0200
From:	Gregory CLEMENT <gregory.clement@...e-electrons.com>
To:	Sebastian Hesselbarth <sebastian.hesselbarth@...il.com>
CC:	Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>, Olof Johansson <olof@...om.net>,
	Jason Cooper <jason@...edaemon.net>,
	Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>,
	Gabriel Dobato <dobatog@...il.com>,
	linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/5] Add proper support for Compulab CM-A510/SBC-A510

Hi Sebastian,

On 06/05/2015 15:13, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> On Wednesday 06 May 2015 15:06:29 Gregory CLEMENT wrote:
>>
>> On 04/05/2015 22:08, Sebastian Hesselbarth wrote:
>>> This is v2 of the patch set to improve current mainline support for
>>> the Compulab CM-A510 System-on-Module (SoM) and its default Compulab
>>> SBC-A510 base board.
>>>
>>> Compared to v1 [1] there have been the overall changes:
>>> - Drop i2c-mux-pinctrl rework as Wolfram Sang raised concerns with
>>>   respect to OF_DYNAMIC. Instead we add i2c-mux-pinctrl node by
>>>   default and wait until corresponding driver respects disabled
>>>   sub-bus nodes. This will add 3 additional i2c busses to all
>>>   Dove based boards, but no functional change with respect to
>>>   i2c-0.
>>> - Split patches dealing with arch/arm/boot/dts/Makefile to route
>>>   them though arm-soc directly.
>>>
>>> Other patches of v1 have already been taken by MVEBU SoC maintainers
>>> as fixes.
>>>
>>> Patches are based on v4.1-rc1 and are intended for v4.2. All patches
>>> contain appropriate Acked-by's from related maintainers. Patches 3
>>> and 5 should go thought arm-soc directly, the rest can go though
>>> mvebu tree.
>>
>> Usually even the change of the arch/arm/boot/dts/Makefile go to
>> arm-soc through mvebu. For patch 5 it makes sens because if the series
>> is spited then the Makefile could be merged before the new file
>> to build.
>>
>> So unless, Arnd or Olof really want to pick the patches 3 and 5 I will
>> apply the patches 2 to 5 on mvebu/dt.
>>
>> Arnd, Olof, do you agree?
> 
> Yes, please pick up all the patches and send them to us with your
> normal pull requests.

patches 2 to 5 applied on mvebu/dt

Thanks,

Gregory


> 
> 	Arnd
> 


-- 
Gregory Clement, Free Electrons
Kernel, drivers, real-time and embedded Linux
development, consulting, training and support.
http://free-electrons.com
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/