[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1431356904-4624-8-git-send-email-fweisbec@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 11 May 2015 17:08:24 +0200
From: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Subject: [PATCH 7/7] preempt: Remove PREEMPT_ACTIVE unmasking off in_atomic()
Now that PREEMPT_ACTIVE implies PREEMPT_DISABLE_OFFSET, ignoring
PREEMPT_ACTIVE from in_atomic() check isn't useful anymore.
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>
---
include/linux/preempt.h | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/include/linux/preempt.h b/include/linux/preempt.h
index 4057696..a1a00e1 100644
--- a/include/linux/preempt.h
+++ b/include/linux/preempt.h
@@ -112,7 +112,7 @@
* used in the general case to determine whether sleeping is possible.
* Do not use in_atomic() in driver code.
*/
-#define in_atomic() ((preempt_count() & ~PREEMPT_ACTIVE) != 0)
+#define in_atomic() (preempt_count() != 0)
/*
* Check whether we were atomic before we did preempt_disable():
--
2.1.4
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists