linux-kernel - Re: arm/arm64 perf build issue with mainline

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20150511155814.GA2724@redhat.com>
Date:	Mon, 11 May 2015 12:58:14 -0300
From:	"acme@...hat.com" <acme@...hat.com>
To:	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
Cc:	Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>,
	David Ahern <david.ahern@...cle.com>,
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Mark Rutland <Mark.Rutland@....com>,
	"jolsa@...nel.org" <jolsa@...nel.org>,
	"namhyung@...nel.org" <namhyung@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: arm/arm64 perf build issue with mainline

Em Mon, May 11, 2015 at 02:33:04PM +0200, Ingo Molnar escreveu:
> 
> * Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com> wrote:
> 
> > On Mon, May 11, 2015 at 09:21:20AM +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> > > * David Ahern <david.ahern@...cle.com> wrote:
> > > > On 4/23/15 5:29 AM, Will Deacon wrote:
> > > > >Commit 6428c59a97de ("perf tools: Set JOBS based on CPU or processor")
> > > > >causes weird behaviour on arm/arm64 platforms because we use the "CPU"
> > > > >prefix for things like:
> > > > >
> > > > >CPU implementer : 0x41
> > > > >CPU architecture: 8
> > > > >CPU variant     : 0x0
> > > > >CPU part        : 0xd03
> > > > >CPU revision    : 0
> > > > >
> > > > >in /proc/cpuinfo. Consequently, a 6 core machine ends up doing:
> > > > >
> > > > >will@...finement-loaf:~/linux/tools/perf$ make
> > > > >   BUILD:   Doing 'make -j36' parallel build
> > > > >
> > > > >which is a little overwhelming. Any chance we can predicate the extra
> > > > >part of the regex on $(ARCH) being sparc?
> > > 
> > > That regex needs to be fixed or replaced with a more robust 'number of 
> > > CPUs on the system' discovery method.
> > 
> > That was already proposed here (as part of the fallback from getconf):
> > 
> >   https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20150427190356.GD474@krava.redhat.com
> > 
> > but I'm not sure what happened to the patch.
> 
> Sending out the latest/best version as a reminder for Arnaldo will 
> sure help it along.
> 
> Acked-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>

IIRC it was merged already, lemme check...

- Arnaldo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/