linux-kernel - RE: [PATCH V9 0/8] large PEBS interrupt threshold

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <37D7C6CF3E00A74B8858931C1DB2F07701824B02@SHSMSX103.ccr.corp.intel.com>
Date:	Mon, 11 May 2015 16:08:55 +0000
From:	"Liang, Kan" <kan.liang@...el.com>
To:	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
CC:	"mingo@...nel.org" <mingo@...nel.org>,
	"acme@...radead.org" <acme@...radead.org>,
	"eranian@...gle.com" <eranian@...gle.com>,
	"andi@...stfloor.org" <andi@...stfloor.org>,
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: RE: [PATCH V9 0/8] large PEBS interrupt threshold



> 
> On Sun, May 10, 2015 at 03:13:07PM -0400, Kan Liang wrote:
> > changes since v8:
> >   - Record 'lost' events to all set bits
> >   - dropped the @id field from the lost samples record
> >   - Print lost samples event nr in perf report --stdio output
> 
> Only the last two patches changed, right? Double checking because I
> already had the others queued in a test branch.

Right. Only the last two patches changed.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/