| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Mon, 11 May 2015 12:50:29 -0400
From: Waiman Long <waiman.long@...com>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
CC: doug.hatch@...com, tglx@...utronix.de, mingo@...nel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, scott.norton@...com,
torvalds@...ux-foundation.org, hpa@...or.com,
linux-tip-commits@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [tip:locking/core] locking/pvqspinlock: Replace xchg() by the
more descriptive set_mb()
On 05/11/2015 10:54 AM, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Mon, May 11, 2015 at 05:43:55AM -0700, tip-bot for Waiman Long wrote:
>> - (void)xchg(&pn->state, vcpu_halted);
>> + set_mb(pn->state, vcpu_halted);
> Hmm, so I looked at the set_mb() definitions and I figure we want to do
> something like the below, right?
Yes, I think we should do that just to be safe from unexpected compiler
optimization.
> ---
> arch/arm/include/asm/barrier.h | 2 +-
> arch/arm64/include/asm/barrier.h | 2 +-
> arch/ia64/include/asm/barrier.h | 2 +-
> arch/metag/include/asm/barrier.h | 2 +-
> arch/mips/include/asm/barrier.h | 2 +-
> arch/powerpc/include/asm/barrier.h | 2 +-
> arch/s390/include/asm/barrier.h | 2 +-
> arch/sparc/include/asm/barrier_64.h | 2 +-
> arch/x86/include/asm/barrier.h | 2 +-
> include/asm-generic/barrier.h | 2 +-
> 10 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm/include/asm/barrier.h b/arch/arm/include/asm/barrier.h
> index d2f81e6b8c1c..993150aea681 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/include/asm/barrier.h
> +++ b/arch/arm/include/asm/barrier.h
> @@ -81,7 +81,7 @@ do { \
> #define read_barrier_depends() do { } while(0)
> #define smp_read_barrier_depends() do { } while(0)
>
> -#define set_mb(var, value) do { var = value; smp_mb(); } while (0)
> +#define set_mb(var, value) do { WRITE_ONCE(var, value); smp_mb(); } while (0)
>
> #define smp_mb__before_atomic() smp_mb()
> #define smp_mb__after_atomic() smp_mb()
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/barrier.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/barrier.h
> index 71f19c4dc0de..ff7de78d01b8 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/barrier.h
> +++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/barrier.h
> @@ -114,7 +114,7 @@ do { \
> #define read_barrier_depends() do { } while(0)
> #define smp_read_barrier_depends() do { } while(0)
>
> -#define set_mb(var, value) do { var = value; smp_mb(); } while (0)
> +#define set_mb(var, value) do { WRITE_ONCE(var, value); smp_mb(); } while (0)
> #define nop() asm volatile("nop");
>
> #define smp_mb__before_atomic() smp_mb()
> diff --git a/arch/ia64/include/asm/barrier.h b/arch/ia64/include/asm/barrier.h
> index f6769eb2bbf9..03117e7b2ab8 100644
> --- a/arch/ia64/include/asm/barrier.h
> +++ b/arch/ia64/include/asm/barrier.h
> @@ -82,7 +82,7 @@ do { \
> * acquire vs release semantics but we can't discuss this stuff with
> * Linus just yet. Grrr...
> */
> -#define set_mb(var, value) do { (var) = (value); mb(); } while (0)
> +#define set_mb(var, value) do { WRITE_ONCE(var, value); mb(); } while (0)
>
> /*
> * The group barrier in front of the rsm& ssm are necessary to ensure
> diff --git a/arch/metag/include/asm/barrier.h b/arch/metag/include/asm/barrier.h
> index d703d8e26a65..97eb018a2933 100644
> --- a/arch/metag/include/asm/barrier.h
> +++ b/arch/metag/include/asm/barrier.h
> @@ -84,7 +84,7 @@ static inline void fence(void)
> #define read_barrier_depends() do { } while (0)
> #define smp_read_barrier_depends() do { } while (0)
>
> -#define set_mb(var, value) do { var = value; smp_mb(); } while (0)
> +#define set_mb(var, value) do { WRITE_ONCE(var, value); smp_mb(); } while (0)
>
> #define smp_store_release(p, v) \
> do { \
> diff --git a/arch/mips/include/asm/barrier.h b/arch/mips/include/asm/barrier.h
> index 2b8bbbcb9be0..cff1bbdaa74a 100644
> --- a/arch/mips/include/asm/barrier.h
> +++ b/arch/mips/include/asm/barrier.h
> @@ -113,7 +113,7 @@
> #endif
>
> #define set_mb(var, value) \
> - do { var = value; smp_mb(); } while (0)
> + do { WRITE_ONCE(var, value); smp_mb(); } while (0)
>
> #define smp_llsc_mb() __asm__ __volatile__(__WEAK_LLSC_MB : : :"memory")
>
> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/barrier.h b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/barrier.h
> index a3bf5be111ff..2a072e48780d 100644
> --- a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/barrier.h
> +++ b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/barrier.h
> @@ -34,7 +34,7 @@
> #define rmb() __asm__ __volatile__ ("sync" : : : "memory")
> #define wmb() __asm__ __volatile__ ("sync" : : : "memory")
>
> -#define set_mb(var, value) do { var = value; mb(); } while (0)
> +#define set_mb(var, value) do { WRITE_ONCE(var, value); mb(); } while (0)
>
> #ifdef __SUBARCH_HAS_LWSYNC
> # define SMPWMB LWSYNC
> diff --git a/arch/s390/include/asm/barrier.h b/arch/s390/include/asm/barrier.h
> index 8d724718ec21..b66cd53d35fc 100644
> --- a/arch/s390/include/asm/barrier.h
> +++ b/arch/s390/include/asm/barrier.h
> @@ -36,7 +36,7 @@
> #define smp_mb__before_atomic() smp_mb()
> #define smp_mb__after_atomic() smp_mb()
>
> -#define set_mb(var, value) do { var = value; mb(); } while (0)
> +#define set_mb(var, value) do { WRITE_ONCE(var, value); mb(); } while (0)
>
> #define smp_store_release(p, v) \
> do { \
> diff --git a/arch/sparc/include/asm/barrier_64.h b/arch/sparc/include/asm/barrier_64.h
> index 76648941fea7..125fec7512f4 100644
> --- a/arch/sparc/include/asm/barrier_64.h
> +++ b/arch/sparc/include/asm/barrier_64.h
> @@ -41,7 +41,7 @@ do { __asm__ __volatile__("ba,pt %%xcc, 1f\n\t" \
> #define dma_wmb() wmb()
>
> #define set_mb(__var, __value) \
> - do { __var = __value; membar_safe("#StoreLoad"); } while(0)
> + do { WRITE_ONCE(__var, __value); membar_safe("#StoreLoad"); } while(0)
>
> #ifdef CONFIG_SMP
> #define smp_mb() mb()
> diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/barrier.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/barrier.h
> index 959e45b81fe2..9de5cde133a1 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/include/asm/barrier.h
> +++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/barrier.h
> @@ -40,7 +40,7 @@
> #define smp_mb() barrier()
> #define smp_rmb() barrier()
> #define smp_wmb() barrier()
> -#define set_mb(var, value) do { var = value; barrier(); } while (0)
> +#define set_mb(var, value) do { WRITE_ONCE(var, value); barrier(); } while (0)
That part is in the !CONFIG_SMP portion. I don't think we need to change it.
Cheers,
Longman
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists