linux-kernel - [PATCH v3 080/110] namei: fold put_link() into the failure case of complete

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <1431367690-5223-80-git-send-email-viro@ZenIV.linux.org.uk>
Date:	Mon, 11 May 2015 19:07:40 +0100
From:	Al Viro <viro@...IV.linux.org.uk>
To:	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc:	Neil Brown <neilb@...e.de>, Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH v3 080/110] namei: fold put_link() into the failure case of complete_walk()

From: Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>

... and don't open-code unlazy_walk() in there - the only reason
for that is to avoid verfication of cached nd->root, which is
trivially avoided by discarding said cached nd->root first.

Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>
---
 fs/namei.c | 29 ++++++-----------------------
 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 23 deletions(-)

diff --git a/fs/namei.c b/fs/namei.c
index c6ff9da..55283fe 100644
--- a/fs/namei.c
+++ b/fs/namei.c
@@ -567,6 +567,8 @@ static inline int nd_alloc_stack(struct nameidata *nd)
  * to restart the path walk from the beginning in ref-walk mode.
  */
 
+static void terminate_walk(struct nameidata *nd);
+
 /**
  * unlazy_walk - try to switch to ref-walk mode.
  * @nd: nameidata pathwalk data
@@ -673,26 +675,12 @@ static int complete_walk(struct nameidata *nd)
 	int status;
 
 	if (nd->flags & LOOKUP_RCU) {
-		nd->flags &= ~LOOKUP_RCU;
 		if (!(nd->flags & LOOKUP_ROOT))
 			nd->root.mnt = NULL;
-
-		if (!legitimize_mnt(nd->path.mnt, nd->m_seq)) {
-			rcu_read_unlock();
-			return -ECHILD;
-		}
-		if (unlikely(!lockref_get_not_dead(&dentry->d_lockref))) {
-			rcu_read_unlock();
-			mntput(nd->path.mnt);
-			return -ECHILD;
-		}
-		if (read_seqcount_retry(&dentry->d_seq, nd->seq)) {
-			rcu_read_unlock();
-			dput(dentry);
-			mntput(nd->path.mnt);
+		if (unlikely(unlazy_walk(nd, NULL))) {
+			terminate_walk(nd);
 			return -ECHILD;
 		}
-		rcu_read_unlock();
 	}
 
 	if (likely(!(nd->flags & LOOKUP_JUMPED)))
@@ -708,7 +696,7 @@ static int complete_walk(struct nameidata *nd)
 	if (!status)
 		status = -ESTALE;
 
-	path_put(&nd->path);
+	terminate_walk(nd);
 	return status;
 }
 
@@ -3008,11 +2996,8 @@ static int do_last(struct nameidata *nd,
 		 * about to look up
 		 */
 		error = complete_walk(nd);
-		if (error) {
-			if (nd->depth)
-				put_link(nd);
+		if (error)
 			return error;
-		}
 
 		audit_inode(name, dir, LOOKUP_PARENT);
 		error = -EISDIR;
@@ -3117,8 +3102,6 @@ finish_lookup:
 finish_open:
 	error = complete_walk(nd);
 	if (error) {
-		if (nd->depth)
-			put_link(nd);
 		path_put(&save_parent);
 		return error;
 	}
-- 
2.1.4

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/