linux-kernel - [PATCH v3 070/110] namei: new calling conventions for walk

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <1431367690-5223-70-git-send-email-viro@ZenIV.linux.org.uk>
Date:	Mon, 11 May 2015 19:07:30 +0100
From:	Al Viro <viro@...IV.linux.org.uk>
To:	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc:	Neil Brown <neilb@...e.de>, Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH v3 070/110] namei: new calling conventions for walk_component()

From: Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>

instead of a single flag (!= 0 => we want to follow symlinks) pass
two bits - WALK_GET (want to follow symlinks) and WALK_PUT (put_link()
once we are done looking at the name).  The latter matters only for
success exits - on failure the caller will discard everything anyway.

Suggestions for better variant are welcome; what this thing aims for
is making sure that pending put_link() is done *before* walk_component()
decides to pick a symlink up, rather than between picking it up and
acting upon it.  See the next commit for payoff.

Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>
---
 fs/namei.c | 30 ++++++++++++++++++++----------
 1 file changed, 20 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)

diff --git a/fs/namei.c b/fs/namei.c
index 19e5c8a..1c9af925 100644
--- a/fs/namei.c
+++ b/fs/namei.c
@@ -1577,7 +1577,9 @@ static inline int should_follow_link(struct dentry *dentry, int follow)
 	return unlikely(d_is_symlink(dentry)) ? follow : 0;
 }
 
-static int walk_component(struct nameidata *nd, int follow)
+enum {WALK_GET = 1, WALK_PUT = 2};
+
+static int walk_component(struct nameidata *nd, int flags)
 {
 	struct path path;
 	struct inode *inode;
@@ -1587,8 +1589,12 @@ static int walk_component(struct nameidata *nd, int follow)
 	 * to be able to know about the current root directory and
 	 * parent relationships.
 	 */
-	if (unlikely(nd->last_type != LAST_NORM))
-		return handle_dots(nd, nd->last_type);
+	if (unlikely(nd->last_type != LAST_NORM)) {
+		err = handle_dots(nd, nd->last_type);
+		if (flags & WALK_PUT)
+			put_link(nd);
+		return err;
+	}
 	err = lookup_fast(nd, &path, &inode);
 	if (unlikely(err)) {
 		if (err < 0)
@@ -1604,7 +1610,9 @@ static int walk_component(struct nameidata *nd, int follow)
 			goto out_path_put;
 	}
 
-	if (should_follow_link(path.dentry, follow)) {
+	if (flags & WALK_PUT)
+		put_link(nd);
+	if (should_follow_link(path.dentry, flags & WALK_GET)) {
 		if (nd->flags & LOOKUP_RCU) {
 			if (unlikely(nd->path.mnt != path.mnt ||
 				     unlazy_walk(nd, path.dentry))) {
@@ -1816,10 +1824,9 @@ OK:
 			if (!name)
 				return 0;
 			/* last component of nested symlink */
-			err = walk_component(nd, LOOKUP_FOLLOW);
-			put_link(nd);
+			err = walk_component(nd, WALK_GET | WALK_PUT);
 		} else {
-			err = walk_component(nd, LOOKUP_FOLLOW);
+			err = walk_component(nd, WALK_GET);
 		}
 		if (err < 0)
 			break;
@@ -2017,9 +2024,12 @@ static inline int lookup_last(struct nameidata *nd)
 		nd->flags |= LOOKUP_FOLLOW | LOOKUP_DIRECTORY;
 
 	nd->flags &= ~LOOKUP_PARENT;
-	err = walk_component(nd, nd->flags & LOOKUP_FOLLOW);
-	if (nd->depth)
-		put_link(nd);
+	err = walk_component(nd,
+			nd->flags & LOOKUP_FOLLOW
+				? nd->depth
+					? WALK_PUT | WALK_GET
+					: WALK_GET
+				: 0);
 	if (err < 0)
 		terminate_walk(nd);
 	return err;
-- 
2.1.4

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/