linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH V3 00/13] POWER DSCR fixes, improvements, docs and tests

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <55519753.4020807@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Date:	Tue, 12 May 2015 11:31:55 +0530
From:	Anshuman Khandual <khandual@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
To:	linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
CC:	mikey@...ling.org, shuahkh@....samsung.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH V3 00/13] POWER DSCR fixes, improvements, docs and tests

On 04/10/2015 01:59 PM, Anshuman Khandual wrote:
> 	This patch series has patches for POWER DSCR fixes, improvements,
> in code documentaion, kernel support user documentation and selftest based
> test cases. It has got five test cases which are derived from Anton's DSCR
> test bucket which can be listed as follows.
> 
> (1) http://ozlabs.org/~anton/junkcode/dscr_default_test.c
> (2) http://ozlabs.org/~anton/junkcode/dscr_explicit_test.c
> (3) http://ozlabs.org/~anton/junkcode/dscr_inherit_exec_test.c
> (4) http://ozlabs.org/~anton/junkcode/dscr_inherit_test.c
> (5) http://ozlabs.org/~anton/junkcode/user_dscr_test.c
> 
> So the derivied test cases have Anton's copyright along with mine but the
> commit message as of now has only my signed-off-by statement. As Anton
> mentioned before he would put his signed-off-by after reviewing these
> modified test cases.
> 
> NOTE1: Anton's original inherit exec test expected the child to have system
> default DSCR value instead of the inherited DSCR value from it's parent.
> But looks like thats not the case when we execute the test, it always
> inherits it's parent's DSCR value over the exec call as well. So I have
> changed the test program assuming its correct to have the inherited DSCR
> value in the fork/execed child program. Please let me know if thats not
> correct and I am missing something there.
> 
> Changes in V3:
> -------------
> - Minor changes to last couple of sysfs test cases
> - Added .gitignore file for the new test directory

Hey Michael/Ben/Mikey,

Do you have any thoughts or updates on this patch series. Its already
been a month for this latest version to be on the list.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/