linux-kernel - Re: lustre_dlm_flags.h GPLv3 license clarification

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Tue, 12 May 2015 18:40:11 -0400
From:	"George G. Davis" <ggdavisiv@...il.com>
To:	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
Cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, devel@...verdev.osuosl.org
Subject: Re: lustre_dlm_flags.h GPLv3 license clarification

Hello Greg,

On Tue, May 12, 2015 at 03:31:17PM -0700, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> On Tue, May 12, 2015 at 06:05:24PM -0400, George G. Davis wrote:
> > Greetings,
> > 
> > As recommended in the thread "SPDX-License-Identifier” [1], I would like to followup with the
> > maintainers of the file drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/include/lustre_dlm_flags.h regarding the GPLv3
> > license statement contained in that file [2]. Is there an GPLv3 exception clause which can be applied
> > for this file similar to the bison exception clause or is this file licensed only under GPLv3 only in which
> > case it would appear to be incompatible with the Linux kernel license [3]?
> 
> Please resend this to the owners of this file (hint, get_maintainers.pl
> will get you the list...)

Oops, I had an old v3.14.41 based version of get_maintainers.pl checked
out.

I'll resend after using the correct version of get_maintainers.pl.

Thanks!

--
Regards,
George

> 
> thanks,
> 
> greg k-h
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/