[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <55528B84.5050700@codeaurora.org>
Date: Tue, 12 May 2015 16:23:48 -0700
From: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...eaurora.org>
To: Sascha Hauer <s.hauer@...gutronix.de>,
Mike Turquette <mturquette@...aro.org>
CC: linux-clk@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, kernel@...gutronix.de
Subject: Re: Automatic clock disabling on clk_put()
On 05/10/15 23:01, Sascha Hauer wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Since we now have per-user clks we could automatically disable clks on
> clk_put() to make the drivers errors paths easier. AFAIR that was one
> of the motivations to switch to per user clks. Is this just not yet
> implemented or are there problems implementing this?
>
>
I don't recall that as being a motivation for per-user clks. The
documentation explicitly states:
* Note: drivers must ensure that all clk_enable calls made on this
* clock source are balanced by clk_disable calls prior to calling
* this function.
so it seems that such a behavior would be an API change. Is it really
that hard to call clk_disable_unprepare() on a clock at the end of an
error path? Maybe you could add a devm_clk_get_prepare_enable() that
does what you want and then call clk_disable_unprepare on the exit path?
--
Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum,
a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists